2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.04.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using post-flood surveys and geomorphologic mapping to evaluate hydrological and hydraulic models: The flash flood of the Girona River (Spain) in 2007

Abstract: This paper analyses the River Girona (Spain) flash flood, occurred the 12th of October 2007, combining hydrological and hydraulic modeling with geomorphologic mapping and post-flood survey information. This research aims to reproduce the flood event in order to understand and decipher the flood processes and dynamics on a system of *Manuscript Click here to download Manuscript: JoH_Girona_Flashflood.docx Click here to view linked References overlapped prograding alluvial fans. The hydrological model TETIS was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The dense urban structures influenced the DEM and the hydraulic simulation in the Stavros floodplain. CSI values over 65% are generally acceptable [13,56] and show that the accuracy of the flood simulation is very close to the real flood extent. The comparison between the simulated and observed flood depths at the 35 points of the Stavros floodplain showed an acceptable accuracy [13,56], where RMSE was estimated at 0.51 m.…”
Section: Hydraulic Modeling and Post-flood Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The dense urban structures influenced the DEM and the hydraulic simulation in the Stavros floodplain. CSI values over 65% are generally acceptable [13,56] and show that the accuracy of the flood simulation is very close to the real flood extent. The comparison between the simulated and observed flood depths at the 35 points of the Stavros floodplain showed an acceptable accuracy [13,56], where RMSE was estimated at 0.51 m.…”
Section: Hydraulic Modeling and Post-flood Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…flood simulation is very close to the real flood extent. The comparison between the simulated and observed flood depths at the 35 points of the Stavros floodplain showed an acceptable accuracy [13,56], where RMSE was estimated at 0.51 m. Regarding the Stavros floodplain, the simulated flood depth and flood extent were delineated very well compared to the respective observed values. It was not feasible to accurately depict the flood depth because of the dense building blocks.…”
Section: Hydraulic Modeling and Post-flood Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Very often, nadiral remote sensed platforms cannot define the level of water, and for this reason, field surveys and ground-based photos are still necessary. A possible solution is the use of models for the estimation of the water depth based on digital terrain model (DTM) or hydraulic models (Bates and De Roo, 2000;Segura-Beltrán et al, 2016), but ground truth validation is needed. Recent development of computer vision applications, such as structure from Motion (SfM) (Snavely, 2008), make this system a possible valid alternative for the creation of a 3-D dataset based on terrestrial or aerial image acquisition systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%