2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using postmortem formalin fixed paraffin-embedded tissues for molecular testing of sudden cardiac death: A cautionary tale of utility and limitations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same year, Bagnall et al were the first to demonstrate the feasibility of NGS on FFPET samples from juvenile SCD cases [36]. A recent study compared results of NGS analysis of 12 SCD cases between FFPET and corresponding non-formalin fixed samples (RNA-later-preserved tissues or bloodstain card): all pathogenic variants, likely pathogenic variants or VUS identified in the nonfixed samples were also confirmed in FFPET samples with a variable degree of confidence, but the latter provided more false positives and negatives, particularly when formalin fixation was longer than 8 days [37]. Therefore, caution is advised for the use of FFPET-derived DNA for genomic studies.…”
Section: Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same year, Bagnall et al were the first to demonstrate the feasibility of NGS on FFPET samples from juvenile SCD cases [36]. A recent study compared results of NGS analysis of 12 SCD cases between FFPET and corresponding non-formalin fixed samples (RNA-later-preserved tissues or bloodstain card): all pathogenic variants, likely pathogenic variants or VUS identified in the nonfixed samples were also confirmed in FFPET samples with a variable degree of confidence, but the latter provided more false positives and negatives, particularly when formalin fixation was longer than 8 days [37]. Therefore, caution is advised for the use of FFPET-derived DNA for genomic studies.…”
Section: Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Lin et al [31] compared variants found in FFPE cardiac tissue samples against paired whole blood samples, using HaloPlex amplification and MiSeq sequencing technology. They found both false negative and false positive variants compared to blood, but also intra-sample variation in the FFPE material, which they attributed to depth of sampling in the tissue block.…”
Section: Ffpe Artefacts -Our Findings In Relation To Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an increased rate of false positives in areas not sufficiently amplified [ 25 ]. Thus, Sanger confirmation is important in all DNA extracted from blood, saliva, or fresh/frozen tissue, and crucial in DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPE) [ 42 ]. In DNA from FFPE fixed for more than 8 days, high ratios of both false positives and false negatives were identified, and reanalysis of samples obtained from different areas of the FFPE block is recommended.…”
Section: Technical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%