Neurobiology of Abnormal Emotion and Motivated Behaviors 2018
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-813693-5.00001-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Preclinical Models to Understand the Neural Basis of Negative Urgency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been a few attempts to do this. A reward omission task was developed to translate and apply negative urgency in a preclinical model of negative urgency using rodents [115,116]. The initial study examined both human and animal models of a reward omission task to represent negative urgency-like behaviors in both species for back-translation [116].…”
Section: Applications To Treatment and Intervention And Suggestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a few attempts to do this. A reward omission task was developed to translate and apply negative urgency in a preclinical model of negative urgency using rodents [115,116]. The initial study examined both human and animal models of a reward omission task to represent negative urgency-like behaviors in both species for back-translation [116].…”
Section: Applications To Treatment and Intervention And Suggestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive and negative urgency are well-documented in tasks that use monetary incentives (Mason, Dunton, Gearhardt, & Leventhal, 2020;Racine et al, 2015;Puhalla, Ammerman, Uyeji, Berman, & McCloskey, 2016;Bardo, Weiss, & Rebec, 2018). Following omission of an expected reward, subjects with high levels of negative urgency show very high levels of frustration and display greater impulsive behaviors than subjects who are low in negative urgency (Bardo, Weiss, & Rebec, 2018). The task-based measures of positive and negative urgency have shown similar results in animal and human studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Compared to children and adults with low positive and negative urgency scores, subjects with high scores on the field of positive and negative urgency respond undesirably to anticipation or omission of reward (Mason, Dunton, Gearhardt, & Leventhal, 2020;Racine et al, 2015;Puhalla, Ammerman, Uyeji, Berman, & McCloskey, 2016;Bardo, Weiss, & Rebec, 2018). Positive and negative urgency are well-documented in tasks that use monetary incentives (Mason, Dunton, Gearhardt, & Leventhal, 2020;Racine et al, 2015;Puhalla, Ammerman, Uyeji, Berman, & McCloskey, 2016;Bardo, Weiss, & Rebec, 2018). Following omission of an expected reward, subjects with high levels of negative urgency show very high levels of frustration and display greater impulsive behaviors than subjects who are low in negative urgency (Bardo, Weiss, & Rebec, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[58][59][60][61][62] Compared to children and adults with low negative urgency, subjects with high negative urgency respond undesirably to reward omission in tasks that use monetary incentives. [63][64][65][66] Following omission of an expected reward, subjects with high levels of negative urgency show frustration and display impulsive behaviors. 66 This study compared the effects of PEA on negative urgency of male and female children in the US.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[63][64][65][66] Following omission of an expected reward, subjects with high levels of negative urgency show frustration and display impulsive behaviors. 66 This study compared the effects of PEA on negative urgency of male and female children in the US. While high PEA is expected to be associated with less negative urgency (Hypothesis 1), this effect may be stronger for males than females (Hypothesis 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%