Proximal Soil Sensing 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-8859-8_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Proximal Sensors to Continuously Monitor Agricultural Soil Physical Conditions for Tillage Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this, we took profit of soil characterization, done after a tillage operation with a rotary arrow [32]. The clod-size distribution was determined, and the soil moisture and dry bulk density of both phases were measured.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Scattering Processes From Tilled Bare Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, we took profit of soil characterization, done after a tillage operation with a rotary arrow [32]. The clod-size distribution was determined, and the soil moisture and dry bulk density of both phases were measured.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Scattering Processes From Tilled Bare Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EMI is sensitive to soil electrical conductivity, which is mainly affected by soil water content (SWC), clay content, and salinity (Corwin and Lesch, 2005;Friedman, 2005), while GPR is sensitive to both soil electrical conductivity and dielectric permittivity, the latter primarily depending on SWC (Topp et al, 1980). Yet, until now, very few studies have used geophysical techniques to investigate the impact of tillage practices (e.g., Basso et al, 2011;Oleschko et al, 2008;Richard et al, 2010). Recently, Müller et al (2009) compared different geophysical techniques to characterize tillage effects on SWC and electrical resistivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%