Capital Cities and Urban Sustainability 2019
DOI: 10.4324/9780429426049-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using public procurement to promote sustainability in Copenhagen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dukungan terhadap UMKM ini, sangat diperlukan mengingat dengan keterbatasan sumberdaya yang dimilikinya, memunculkan anggapan bahwa UMKM akan sulit terlibat dalam pengadaan publik berkelanjutan, utamanya dalam memenuhi standar kriteria berkelanjutan. Namun, hasil penelitian (Andhov, 2019) menunjukkan bahwa klaim bahwa keberlanjutan dan partisipasi UMKM bukanlah sesuatu yang bertolak belakang. Keterbatasan dari segi ukuran, permodalan, pengalaman dan kapabilitas teknis, dapat diatas dengan adanya peraturan hukum yang dapat memecahkan masalah ini dalam pengadaan publik berkelanjutan.…”
Section: A2 Meningkatkan Peran Serta Umkm;unclassified
“…Dukungan terhadap UMKM ini, sangat diperlukan mengingat dengan keterbatasan sumberdaya yang dimilikinya, memunculkan anggapan bahwa UMKM akan sulit terlibat dalam pengadaan publik berkelanjutan, utamanya dalam memenuhi standar kriteria berkelanjutan. Namun, hasil penelitian (Andhov, 2019) menunjukkan bahwa klaim bahwa keberlanjutan dan partisipasi UMKM bukanlah sesuatu yang bertolak belakang. Keterbatasan dari segi ukuran, permodalan, pengalaman dan kapabilitas teknis, dapat diatas dengan adanya peraturan hukum yang dapat memecahkan masalah ini dalam pengadaan publik berkelanjutan.…”
Section: A2 Meningkatkan Peran Serta Umkm;unclassified
“…According to the second approach, certain limitations refer to the MS' (and, by extension, a contracting authority's) freedom to enable or ignore GPP. 68 This second set of limitations derives from the small number of GPP provisions with mandatory character (Articles: 18(2), 69 and 71 of the Public Procurement Directive) and its scope depends on the normative content of these provisions. Thus, contrary to the clear demarcation of the first set of limitations, the delimitation of the second body of limitations is determined mainly by the content and the (binding?)…”
Section: Exploring the Ways To Give Effect To The Gpp Requirements 51 Unpacking The Discrepancies Between Discretion And Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That being said, if a Member State has not transposed Article 18(2) and the contracting authority has failed at some point in the public procurement process to take measures to check the compliance mentioned in Article 18 (2), what would the legal consequences be? 71 In the same vein, provided a Member State fully transposes Article 18(2), but the national contracting authorities decide not to take any measures to ensure compliance according to this provision, how will the use of their discretionary power be reviewed? Moreover, the concept of "appropriate measures" expected to be taken by the MS does not shed light on the concrete tasks to be taken over so that this provision is given fully effect.…”
Section: Exploring the Ways To Give Effect To The Gpp Requirements 51 Unpacking The Discrepancies Between Discretion And Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%