Using qualitative Health Research methods to improve patient and public involvement and engagement in research

Abstract

Plain English summaryPatient engagement (or patient and public involvement) in health research is becoming a requirement for many health research funders, yet many researchers have little or no experience in engaging patients as partners as opposed to research subjects. Additionally, many patients have no experience providing input on the research design or acting as a decision-making partner on a research team. Several potential risks exist when patient engagement is done poorly, despite best intentions. Some of these risks are that: (1) patients’ involvement is merely tokenism (patients are involved but their suggestions have little influence on how research is conducted); (2) engaged patients do not represent the diversity of people affected by the research; and, (3) research outcomes lack relevance to patients’ lives and experiences.Qualitative health research (the collection and systematic analysis of non-quantitative data about peoples’ experiences of health or illness and the healthcare system) offers several approaches that can help to mitigate these risks. Several qualitative health research methods, when done well, can help research teams to: (1) accurately incorporate patients’ perspectives and experiences into the design and conduct of research; (2) engage diverse patient perspectives; and, (3) treat patients as equal and ongoing partners on the research team.This commentary presents several established qualitative health research methods that are relevant to patient engagement in research. The hope is that this paper will inspire readers to seek more information about qualitative health research, and consider how its established methods may help improve the quality and ethical conduct of patient engagement for health research.Abstract Background Research funders in several countries have posited a new vision for research that involves patients and the public as co-applicants for the funding, and as collaborative partners in decision-making at various stages and/or throughout the research process. Patient engagement (or patient and public involvement) in health research is presented as a more democratic approach that leads to research that is relevant to the lives of the people affected by its outcomes. What is missing from the recent proliferation of resources and publications detailing the practical aspects of patient engagement is a recognition of how existing research methods can inform patient engagement initiatives. Qualitative health research, for example, has established methods of collecting and analyzing non-quantitative data about individuals’ and communities’ lived experiences with health, illness and/or the healthcare system. Included in the paradigm of qualitative health research is participatory health research, which offers approaches to partnering with individuals and communities to design and conduct research that addresses their needs and priorities. Discussion The purpose of this commentary is to explore how qualitative health research methods can inform and support meaningful engag...

Participating in core outcome set development via Delphi surveys: qualitative interviews provide pointers to inform guidance

“…The importance of representing of all relevant stakeholder groups including patients in COS development4 7 is increasingly recognised, as it is in wider health research 16–18. There is also growing appreciation of the importance of supporting their participation in ways that are meaningful, thus avoiding tokenism and enhancing the credibility and validity of the resulting research 19 20. However, our findings suggest that not all the interviewees thought their participation in COS development was meaningful, as the purpose and process of the study were communicated in ways that were not accessible for them.…”

End of life care for people with alcohol and drug problems: Findings from a Rapid Evidence Assessment

“…Such qualitative inquiry should extend to patients' voices that are currently under‐researched and almost absent from the existing evidence. More dense description is required including social, demographic and health profiles of participants as well as setting and context to enhance transferability (Rolfe, Ramsden, Banner, & Graham, ). A clear representation of people with problematic substance use can give diverse perspectives to design relevant and appropriate studies and enhance sustainability (Wilson et al, ).…”

The research burden of randomized controlled trial participation: a systematic thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence

“…Further, we need to explore other study designs that could reduce burden and improve external validity such as trials embedded in registries, cohorts, or routinely collected data [43] but also observational studies and use of routinely collected data. Patient and public involvement at the planning stage of the trial could also help reduce the burden [44][45][46] and drawing on patients' experiential knowledge, ideas, and input when designing interventions to reduce research burden is essential [47][48][49][50]. The amount of data recorded as well as the modalities for recording data could also be questioned.…”