Using qualitative insights to change practice: exploring the culture of antibiotic prescribing and consumption for urinary tract infections

Abstract

ObjectivesThe aim of this paper is to explore the culture of antibiotic prescribing and consumption in the community for urinary tract infections (UTI) from the perspective of the general practitioners (GPs) and community member.DesignIndepth interviews were conducted with GPs, and focus groups were held with community members.SettingGeneral practice and community setting.Participants15 GPs practising in rural and urban locations in Ireland participated in the indepth interviews. 6 focus groups (n=42) with participants who had direct or indirect experiences with UTI were also undertaken.ResultsThe decision to prescribe or consume an antibiotic for a UTI is a set of complex processes including need recognition, information search and evaluation processes governed by the relationship and interactions between the GP and the patient. Different GP and patient decision-making profiles emerged emphasising the diversity and variety of general practice in real-life settings. The GP findings showed a requirement for more microbiological information on antibiotic resistance patterns to inform prescribing decisions. Focus group participants wanted a conversation with the GP about their illness and the treatment options available.ConclusionsCollectively, this research identified the consultation as a priority intervention environment for stimulating change in relation to antibiotics. This paper demonstrates how qualitative research can identify the interacting processes which are instrumental to the decision to prescribe or consume an antibiotic for a suspected UTI. Qualitative research empowers researchers to investigate the what, how and why of interventions in real-life setting. Qualitative research can play a critical and instrumental role in designing behavioural change strategies with high impact on practice. The results of this research were used to design a complex intervention informed by social marketing.Trial registration numberNCT01913860; Pre-results.

Open label feasibility study evaluating D-mannose combined with home-based monitoring of suspected urinary tract infections in patients with multiple sclerosis

“…In an emerging health care system of shared decision making, the decision to use antibiotics for a UTI is based on a set of complex processes including need recognition, information search and evaluation processes governed by the relationship and interactions between the physician and the patient . Matching this patients in our study were first instructed to recognize symptoms and signs of UTIs .…”

What drives inappropriate antibiotic dispensing? A mixed-methods study of pharmacy employee perspectives in Haryana, India

“…Most studies of inappropriate antibiotic use in Europe and the USA have focused on prescribing, with doctors as the key gatekeepers for medication access 17–20. However, recent studies from Spain and Portugal have identified inappropriate dispensing of antibiotics by pharmacists as a non-trivial practice that warrants concern and further evaluation 21–24.…”

GPs' perceptions of AMR and antimicrobial stewardship

“…Certainly, research has highlighted how difficult it is to capture the complex interactions that contribute to antibiotic prescribing for UTIs. 8 It is reassuring that all GP respondents to our short survey agreed that antibiotic resistance is a threat, as it is argued that one challenge in reducing antibiotic use is the disconnect between individual behaviour and population-level resistance. 9 It is interesting to note that 57 per cent (23/40) of respondents perceived that colleagues in their practice could do a lot or a little better at reducing their prescribing.…”