2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00833-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using qualitative research to develop an elaboration of the TIDieR checklist for interventions to enhance vaccination communication: short report

Abstract: Background The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increased interest in communication with the public regarding vaccination. Our recent Cochrane qualitative evidence synthesis points to several factors that could influence the implementation and success of healthcare worker communication with older adults about vaccination. However, it is often difficult to assess whether factors identified as potentially important in qualitative studies have been considered in randomized trials because of poor tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, application of the tool is dependent on adequate description within source materials. Although we know little about how well unconventional source materials describe their subject, there is evidence of important gaps in descriptions within programme reports in the SRMNCAH field [ 50 ] and poor reporting is acknowledged widely in relation to intervention descriptions and other key information regarding the implementation of health interventions [ 16 , 57 , 58 ]. The range and nature of unconventional source materials (Table 2 ), and the lack of reporting standards for many of these, probably makes it more likely that these will not always include the information needed for assessment with the ACE tool.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, application of the tool is dependent on adequate description within source materials. Although we know little about how well unconventional source materials describe their subject, there is evidence of important gaps in descriptions within programme reports in the SRMNCAH field [ 50 ] and poor reporting is acknowledged widely in relation to intervention descriptions and other key information regarding the implementation of health interventions [ 16 , 57 , 58 ]. The range and nature of unconventional source materials (Table 2 ), and the lack of reporting standards for many of these, probably makes it more likely that these will not always include the information needed for assessment with the ACE tool.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, application of the tool is dependent on adequate description within source materials. Although we know little about how well unconventional source materials describe their subject, there is evidence of important gaps in descriptions within programme reports in the SRMNCAH field [49] and poor reporting is acknowledged widely in relation to intervention descriptions and other key information regarding the implementation of health interventions [16,56,57]. The range and nature of unconventional source materials (Table 2), and the lack of reporting standards for many of these, probably makes it more likely that they will not always include the information needed for assessment with the ACE tool.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Ace Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%