2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00190-020-01361-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using real polar ground gravimetry data to solve the GOCE polar gap problem in satellite-only gravity field recovery

Abstract: With the successful completion of European Space Agency (ESA)'s PolarGAP campaign, ground gravity data are now available for both polar regions. Therefore, it is now possible to solve the GOCE polar gap problem in satellite-only gravity field recovery by using additional polar ground gravity data instead of some regularization methods. However, ground gravimetry data need to be filtered to remove the short-wavelength information beyond a certain harmonic degree to avoid spectral leakage when inferring satellit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various kinds of prior information are possible, e.g., additional data sources from GRACE (e.g., Bruinsma et al 2014) or terrestrial campaigns (e.g., Zingerle et al 2019b;Lu et al 2020). To remain independent of other gravity field data, the time-wise modeling applies simple mathematical smoothness conditions to force the full signal toward zero using regularization.…”
Section: Prior Information To Stabilize the Goce-only Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various kinds of prior information are possible, e.g., additional data sources from GRACE (e.g., Bruinsma et al 2014) or terrestrial campaigns (e.g., Zingerle et al 2019b;Lu et al 2020). To remain independent of other gravity field data, the time-wise modeling applies simple mathematical smoothness conditions to force the full signal toward zero using regularization.…”
Section: Prior Information To Stabilize the Goce-only Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IGGT_R1C is better than GOCO01S due to the contribution of more GRACE observations (ITSG-Grace2014s compared to ITG-Grace2010s) and the polar gravity anomalies (Mayer-Gürr et al, 2010;Pail et al, 2010). Additional GNSS/leveling checking and gravimetry data checking could be found in the former publications (Lu et al, 2018b;Lu et al, 2020).…”
Section: Applications In Gravity Field Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it has limitations to use MPI programming models between nodes. In this context, we studied a parallel numerical algorithm based on MPI and OpenMP programming models to speed up the calculation progress on small HPC clusters for global and regional gravity field recovery [e.g., IGGT_R1, IGGT_R1C, HUST-Grace2016, HUST-Grace2016s (Lu et al, 2017a;Zhou et al, 2017a;Lu et al, 2017b;Zhou et al, 2017b;Lu et al, 2018b;Zhou et al, 2018;Lu et al, 2020)]. Specifically, MPI is used for inter-node communication, and OpenMP is used for intra-node communication (Pacheco, 1997;Gropp et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the uniformed vertical datum could also be transformed to the geoid derived from the latest gravity field models, e.g., EIGEN-6C4 or future uniformed local geoid in the Baltic Sea area, which contain the latest satellite gravimetry data from the Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment (GRACE), Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE), as well as GRACE-FO (e.g., [59][60][61][62][63][64][65]). For example, the RMS of geoid differences between EIGEN-6C4 and EGM2008 is 3 cm in this study area.…”
Section: Checking and Combining Different Gravity Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%