2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using realistic host galaxy metallicities to improve the GRB X-ray equivalent total hydrogen column density and constrain the intergalactic medium density

Abstract: It is known that the GRB equivalent hydrogen column density (NHX) changes with redshift and that, typically, NHX is greater than the GRB host neutral hydrogen column density. We have compiled a large sample of data for GRB NHX and metallicity [X/H]. The main aims of this paper are to generate improved NHX for our sample by using actual metallicities, dust corrected where available for detections, and for the remaining GRB, a more realistic average intrinsic metallicity using a standard adjustment from solar. T… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The easiest explanation involves material in the host galaxy, either local to the GRB (Galama & Wijers 2001;Stratta et al 2004;Gendre et al 2006;Schady et al 2007;Campana et al 2012) or on a more extended basis (HII regions, Watson et al 2013;molecular clouds, Reichart & Price 2002;Campana et al 2006). Another possibility involves the metal contribution from the intergalactic medium (IGM) along the line of site (Behar et al 2011;Starling et al 2013;Campana et al 2015;Dalton & Morris 2020). These possibilities are not mutually exclusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The easiest explanation involves material in the host galaxy, either local to the GRB (Galama & Wijers 2001;Stratta et al 2004;Gendre et al 2006;Schady et al 2007;Campana et al 2012) or on a more extended basis (HII regions, Watson et al 2013;molecular clouds, Reichart & Price 2002;Campana et al 2006). Another possibility involves the metal contribution from the intergalactic medium (IGM) along the line of site (Behar et al 2011;Starling et al 2013;Campana et al 2015;Dalton & Morris 2020). These possibilities are not mutually exclusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schady et al 2011;Watson et al 2013;Buchner, Schulze & Bauer 2017). The other school of thought argues that while the host can have an absorption contribution, the IGM contributes substantially to the excess absorption and is redshift related (e.g Starling et al 2013a;Arcodia, Campana & Salvaterra 2016;Rahin & Behar 2019;Dalton & Morris 2020;Dalton, Morris & Fumagalli 2021, hereafter D20, D21). The convention in earlier studies using AGN and GRBs was to use solar metallicity for a neutral absorber, as a device used to place all of the absorbing column density measurements on a comparable scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the X-ray absorption might not reflect the true density in the GRB environment (e.g. Rahin & Behar 2019 ;Dalton & Morris 2020 ), it is possible that GRB 210419A resides in a highdensity surrounding medium that prevents low-frequency emission from escaping.…”
Section: S U M M a Ry A N D C O N C L U S I O N Smentioning
confidence: 99%