2013
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201303183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Remote Substituents to Control Solution Structure and Anion Binding in Lanthanide Complexes

Abstract: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-pro t purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[14][15][16] One outcome of this research is that we now have the tools to probe and control the structure and speciation of lanthanide(III) ions in aqueous media, [17][18][19][20] in particular when working with kinetically inert complexes. This new level of control informs the design of responsive luminescent probes, [21][22][23][24][25][26] and allows for detailed physico-chemical investigations in solution. 19,[27][28][29][30][31][32] Extensive published work has determined that ligands comprising a cyclen scaffold and three or four carboxylate (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16] One outcome of this research is that we now have the tools to probe and control the structure and speciation of lanthanide(III) ions in aqueous media, [17][18][19][20] in particular when working with kinetically inert complexes. This new level of control informs the design of responsive luminescent probes, [21][22][23][24][25][26] and allows for detailed physico-chemical investigations in solution. 19,[27][28][29][30][31][32] Extensive published work has determined that ligands comprising a cyclen scaffold and three or four carboxylate (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eu 2 ⋅ 2 , Scheme ), Eu 2 ⋅ 1 displayed strong selectivity for isophthalate at 16,660 m −1 in the presence of 1 m m lithium hydroxide, compared with 24,600 m −1 in pure methanolic solution. Not only does this provide evidence of competitive binding by hydroxide, but the value in the absence of hydroxide is five times lower than that determined for Eu 2 ⋅ 2 . To investigate this further, we studied the binding of phthalate and terephthalate, determining the binding constants in methanol in the presence of 1 m m lithium hydroxide.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…5‐Nitro‐α,α′‐bis(Eu⋅DO3Ayl)‐ m ‐xylene (Eu 2 ⋅ 1 ) was prepared as previously described . The salt content was determined using elemental analysis, while the europium content was determined using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP‐MS).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 and Table S1, ESI †). 34,37,38 These conformational changes will, of course, have direct consequences on the relaxation through self-assembly. Somewhat counter-intuitively, relaxometric characteristics were less strongly enhanced at high solution pH (9)(10)(11)(12) also.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%