2021
DOI: 10.1080/1554480x.2021.1944866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using repeated reading for reading fluency development in a small Japanese foreign language program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
13
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Their study indicated that fluent readers are not necessarily good at comprehension. Their study also reinforced the findings in Taguchi and Gorsuch's (2002) study, where the results suggested that RR reading did not improve reading comprehension. However, later research conducted by Taguchi and Gorsuch in 2008 and 2010, supports the current study's results.…”
Section: Findings Of the Studysupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their study indicated that fluent readers are not necessarily good at comprehension. Their study also reinforced the findings in Taguchi and Gorsuch's (2002) study, where the results suggested that RR reading did not improve reading comprehension. However, later research conducted by Taguchi and Gorsuch in 2008 and 2010, supports the current study's results.…”
Section: Findings Of the Studysupporting
confidence: 75%
“…One outstanding difference here, however, was that most of the students in the earlier studies had been learning at upper grade levels (Amayrah, 2016). Dowhower (1989) stated that repeated reading can be equally effective for both children and adults, but this claim is disputed in other research which suggests that repeated reading is more influential with regard to reading fluency than with reading comprehension (Taguchi & Gorsuch, 2002). This finding was supported by another study that found simple, quick recognition of words did nothing to develop reading comprehension (Paige, Rasinski, Magpuri-Lavell, & Smith, 2014).…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, support for the efficacy of RWL in promoting comprehension has been less consistent (Amer, 1997;Dhaif, 1990;Diao & Sweller, 2007;Košak-Babuder et al, 2019;Pellicer-Sánchez et al, 2020, 2021Serrano & Pellicer-Sánchez, 2022;Taguchi et al, 2012;Tragant-Mestres et al, 2019;Woodall, 2010), signaling the possibility that RWL could have differential effects based on learner variables (e.g., silent reading speed; hence the alignment with the audio speed), linguistic variables (e.g., text complexity in terms of vocabulary and sentence structure), and the unimodal baseline against which RWL is attested (e.g., RWL vs. silent reading and RWL vs. listening).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buna ek olarak, Chomsky (1976Chomsky ( , 1978 yardımlı okuma uygulamasının öğrencilerle sınıfta çalışılan ve üzerinde alıştırma yapılan metinler kadar daha önce okunmamış yeni metinlerde de okuma akıcılığını geliştirdiğini ortaya koymuştur. Buna ek olarak, yardımlı okuma ile öğrencilerin okumaya karşı tutumları ve kendilerine olan güvenlerini geliştirdiği de belirtilmektedir (Chomsky, 1978;Koda, 2005;Reitsma, 1988;Samuels, 2002;Taguchi, Takayasu-Maass, Gorsuch, 2004).…”
unclassified
“…Benzer şekilde, ikinci dilde ve yabancı dilde de yardımlı okumanın sınıf içinde kullanımının akıcılığı ve anlamayı olumlu yönde etkilediğini ortaya koyan çalışmalar bulunmaktadır (Battle, 1993: Garcia, 2000. Taguchi, Takayasu-Maass, Gorsuch (2004) ikinci dil öğrencilerine hem sesli hem de grafik formunda cümleler sunulduğunda onların iki algı kanalının devreye soktuğunu ve bunun da uzun süreli bellekte kelimelerin ve dilbilgisi yapılarının akılda tutulmasını arttırabileceğini belirtmektedirler. Długosz (2000) ek bir algı kanalının dahil edilmesinin herhangi bir kelimenin çağrışım sayısını arttırarak uzun süreli hafızada kalmasına yardımcı olduğunu ifade etmektedir.…”
unclassified