2018
DOI: 10.1121/1.5039840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using residential proximity to wind turbines as an alternative exposure measure to investigate the association between wind turbines and human health

Abstract: This analysis uses data from the Community Noise and Health Study developed by Statistics Canada to investigate the association between residential proximity to wind turbines and health-related outcomes in a dataset that also provides objective measures of wind turbine noise. The findings indicate that residential proximity to wind turbines is correlated with annoyance and health-related quality of life measures. These associations differ in some respects from associations with noise measurements. Results can … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…to consider quantification of amplitude modulation and tonality [1] [32]; to study occupational "work-related injury and accident rates, and health outcomes in later life cycle phases" [5]; to conduct epidemiological and laboratory research by health professionals and acousticians [14]; to research occupational worker exposure [15] and confirm occupational exposure results [18]; to focus on alternative exposures other than noise [79]; to intentionally explore the factors regarding differences in community responses to WT noise [55]; to conduct experimental and observational studies regarding wind turbine noise and health [2]; to determine the distances that risks become negligible [21]; to replicate findings [85]; to assess health status before and after WT development [79] [81];…”
Section: Discussion: What Is the Way Forward-more Research Preventiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…to consider quantification of amplitude modulation and tonality [1] [32]; to study occupational "work-related injury and accident rates, and health outcomes in later life cycle phases" [5]; to conduct epidemiological and laboratory research by health professionals and acousticians [14]; to research occupational worker exposure [15] and confirm occupational exposure results [18]; to focus on alternative exposures other than noise [79]; to intentionally explore the factors regarding differences in community responses to WT noise [55]; to conduct experimental and observational studies regarding wind turbine noise and health [2]; to determine the distances that risks become negligible [21]; to replicate findings [85]; to assess health status before and after WT development [79] [81];…”
Section: Discussion: What Is the Way Forward-more Research Preventiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only background-level noises and the modelled wind turbine sound were. Therefore, it was not possible to model sound using alternative methods, such as using G-weighted modelled sound, which would better account for low frequency sound waves … [79].…”
Section: Availability Of Raw Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in part (b) above, this has been done in the past using calculated noise levels with limited success. However, more recently, Barry et al [162] found good correlation between proximity to wind turbines and annoyance as well as health-related quality of life measures.…”
Section: (D)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are opinions that large wind turbines, especially their parks, disfigure the landscape, and pose a threat to birds and bats [5,6]. The people living near wind turbines are constantly exposed to up to 45 dB(A) of sound, which increases stress, causes insomnia and thus affects health [7,9,10,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%