2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11146-018-9692-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Revisions as a Measure of Price Index Quality in Repeat-Sales Models

Abstract: Repeat-sales indexes are the most widely used type of transaction based property price indexes. However, such indexes are particularly prone to revision. When a new period of transaction data becomes available and is used to update the repeat-sales model, all past index values can potentially be revised. These revisions are especially problematical for commercial real estate (as compared to housing), due to the relative scarcity of transaction data and the heterogeneity of the underlying properties. From a met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, we would have to omit a lot of data if we would use property and investor fixed effects. It is well known from indexing literature that only including properties that sold multiple times in the data introduces a bias toward "winners", or "better" properties, see Abraham and Schauman (1991), Shiller (1993), Clapp and Giaccotto (1999), Clapham et al (2006), and Van de Minne et al (2019) for more details on this bias. These random effects "capture" all (non time-varying) unobserved heterogeneity of properties and investors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, we would have to omit a lot of data if we would use property and investor fixed effects. It is well known from indexing literature that only including properties that sold multiple times in the data introduces a bias toward "winners", or "better" properties, see Abraham and Schauman (1991), Shiller (1993), Clapp and Giaccotto (1999), Clapham et al (2006), and Van de Minne et al (2019) for more details on this bias. These random effects "capture" all (non time-varying) unobserved heterogeneity of properties and investors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use two datasets (RCA, and RCA CPPIs) to construct this value. The RCA CPPIs (or Real Capital Analytics Commercial Property Price Indexes in full) are asset price indexes based on a structural time series repeat sales model given in Van de Minne et al (2019). The RCA CPPIs are location and sector (i.e.…”
Section: Measuring Investor Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 In order to apply the method in thin markets, the time trend in the repeat sales equation is modeled as a random walk with an additional autoregressive (AR) parameter on the returns. As discussed in more depth in Van de Minne et al (2019) an AR representation (inertia) is inherent to the price formation process in the real estate market. We therefore specify the returns in the state equation as an AR process with parameter (ρ):…”
Section: Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then plug in the difference between the IMRs in the repeat sales model as given by Equation (16). We estimate the repeat sales model in a Bayesian framework similar to the Commercial Property Price Indexes published by RCA (Van de Minne et al, 2019). The difference is that we use normally distributed errors instead of t-distributed errors in order to use the multivariate…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper relates to multiple strands in the literature. First, it fits in the growing field of structural time-series repeat sales models, where time fixed effects (dummy variables) are replaced by a stochastic trend specification (Francke, 2010;Francke & Van de Minne, 2017;Van de Minne et al, 2020). Bollerslev et al (2016) provide an example of daily house pricing in the United States using such a stochastic trend specification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%