2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0885-2308(03)00027-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using rule-induction techniques to model pronunciation variation in Dutch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, these rules are especially interesting for pronunciation variation modeling for ASR systems. However, to our knowledge, only '[n]-deletion after schwa' has so far been applied for these purposes (e.g., Hoste et al, 2004;Van Bael, 2007).…”
Section: General Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, these rules are especially interesting for pronunciation variation modeling for ASR systems. However, to our knowledge, only '[n]-deletion after schwa' has so far been applied for these purposes (e.g., Hoste et al, 2004;Van Bael, 2007).…”
Section: General Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How to get the pronunciation variations is the most important problem. We can study it in two ways: knowledge-based [6] and data-driven [7].…”
Section: Multi-pronunciation Dictionarymentioning
confidence: 99%