1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0375-9474(96)00320-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Salpeter's propagator for solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14) 15) where the first term on the right hand side of the above two equations is the projection of each momentum onto the total momentum. The above definition of the relative momentum guarantees the orthogonality of the total momentum and the relative momentum, …”
Section: Hamiltonian Formulation Of the 2-body Problem From Constmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…14) 15) where the first term on the right hand side of the above two equations is the projection of each momentum onto the total momentum. The above definition of the relative momentum guarantees the orthogonality of the total momentum and the relative momentum, …”
Section: Hamiltonian Formulation Of the 2-body Problem From Constmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much progress has been made in the study of relativistic two-body bound state problems [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. In the 1970s, several authors used Dirac's constraint mechanics [1] to attack the relativistic two-body problem at its classical roots [2], successfully evading the so-call "no interaction theorem" [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The argument of the δ and the inverse of the propagator should be combinations of the operators used in the free equations (at last approximately and for the positive-energy solutions). Ther exists an infinity of possible combinations [8,12,19,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. The best choice depends on the quantities one wants to compute (energy of the lowest state, hyperfine splitting, recoil of a nucleus, etc...) and on the properties one wants to preserve exactly in the first approximation (cluster separability, Lorentz invariance, heavy mass limits, charge conjugation symmetry...).…”
Section: Notationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bethe-Salpeter equation [1,2] is the usual tool for computing relativistic bound states [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. The principal difficulty of this equation comes from the presence of N-1 (for N particles) unphysical degrees of freedom: the relative time-energy degrees of freedom.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%