2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13050851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Satellite Image Fusion to Evaluate the Impact of Land Use Changes on Ecosystem Services and Their Economic Values

Abstract: Accelerated land use change is a current challenge for environmental management worldwide. Given the urgent need to incorporate economic and ecological goals in landscape planning, cost-effective conservation strategies are required. In this study, we validated the benefit of fusing imagery from multiple sensors to assess the impact of landscape changes on ecosystem services (ES) and their economic values in the Long County, Shaanxi Province, China. We applied several landscape metrics to assess the local spat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them, the selected indices at the type level were as follows: the patch density (PD), average patch area (AREA_MN), maximum patch index (LPI), cohesion index (COHESION), and landscape shape index (LSI). At the landscape level, the selected indices were as follows: the sprawl index (CONTAG), Shannon diversity index (SHDI), and Shannon evenness index (SHEI) (Shuangao, Padmanaban, et al, 2021;Yang, 2021). Then, we used the moving window method to calculate the local-level landscape pattern index (Hagen-Zanker, 2016), and we finally obtained its spatial distribution.…”
Section: Landscape Pattern Index Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, the selected indices at the type level were as follows: the patch density (PD), average patch area (AREA_MN), maximum patch index (LPI), cohesion index (COHESION), and landscape shape index (LSI). At the landscape level, the selected indices were as follows: the sprawl index (CONTAG), Shannon diversity index (SHDI), and Shannon evenness index (SHEI) (Shuangao, Padmanaban, et al, 2021;Yang, 2021). Then, we used the moving window method to calculate the local-level landscape pattern index (Hagen-Zanker, 2016), and we finally obtained its spatial distribution.…”
Section: Landscape Pattern Index Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The landscape index condenses a large amount of landscape pattern information that reflects the characteristics of spatial configuration and structural composition ( Guo et al., 2021 ; Shuangao et al., 2021 ; Yang, 2021 ). In striving to choose elements that are representative, simplified and common ( Mengist et al., 2021 ), and by referring to relevant research results ( Guo et al., 2021 ; Yang, 2021 ) and combining the actual situation of the study area, we choose aggregation index (AI), area-weighted mean fractal dimension index (FRAC_AM), mean patch area (AREA_MN), number of patches (NP), largest patch index (LPI), and percentage of landscape (PLAND).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crucial problem is to attain a fused image with enhanced target regions and suppressed backgrounds from the spaceborne and airborne SAR images, in order to increase the target-to-clutter ratio (TCR) and improve the vessel target detection performance. Considering the issue of image fusion, some works have been carried out in the existing literature [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. The most straightforward and computationally efficient fusion methods are arithmetic-based fusion approaches, such as addition fusion and multiplication fusion, but this class of fusion approaches might maintain a high level of background clutter, resulting in false alarms, or excessively suppress relatively weak targets, resulting in missed detections [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%