Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Workshop on Multimedia Information Retrieval 2006
DOI: 10.1145/1178677.1178687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using score distributions for query-time fusion in multimediaretrieval

Abstract: In this paper we present the results of our work on the analysis of multi-modal data for video Information Retrieval, where we exploit the properties of this data for query-time, automatic generation of weights for multi-modal data fusion. Through empirical testing we have observed that for a given topic, a high performing feature, that is one which achieves high relevance, will have a different distribution of document scores when compared against those that do not perform as well. These observations form the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each keyframe, the system extracts six low-level features: colour layout, colour histogram, edge histogram, Tamura texture feature histogram, colour and edge directivity descriptor (CEDD) [4], and fuzzy colour and texture histogram (FCTH) [5]. As a query-time fusion methodology for the different low-level features and visual examples, we use the method described in [24]. We discard the use of the ASR output and high-level concepts, as it would not drive any additional conclusions to our experiments; we assume these features are complementary to the low-level features obtained from the visual examples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each keyframe, the system extracts six low-level features: colour layout, colour histogram, edge histogram, Tamura texture feature histogram, colour and edge directivity descriptor (CEDD) [4], and fuzzy colour and texture histogram (FCTH) [5]. As a query-time fusion methodology for the different low-level features and visual examples, we use the method described in [24]. We discard the use of the ASR output and high-level concepts, as it would not drive any additional conclusions to our experiments; we assume these features are complementary to the low-level features obtained from the visual examples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each keyframe, the system extracts six low-level features: colour layout, colour histogram, edge histogram, Tamura texture feature histogram, colour and edge directivity descriptor (CEDD) [3], and fuzzy colour and texture histogram (FCTH) [4]. As a query-time fusion methodology for the different low-level features and visual examples, we use the method described in [19]. We discard the use of the ASR output and high level concepts, as it would not drive any additional conclusions to our experiments; we assume these features are complementary to the low-level features obtained from the visual examples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is based on the observation that if one was to plot the normalized scores of an expert against that of scores of other experts used for a particular query, then the expert whose scores showed the greatest initial change tends to be the best performer for that query. While we acknowledge this observation is not universal, it has been shown empirically to improve retrieval performance [10]; we also used this technique for our participation in ImageCLEFPhoto 2007 [6].…”
Section: Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%