1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(98)00423-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using shelterwood harvests and prescribed fire to regenerate oak stands on productive upland sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
84
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
84
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Correctly implementing the shelterwood-burn technique (Brose et al 1999a(Brose et al , 1999b) is more than simply applying fire to a partially-cut oak stand. The proper application of the technique actually begins before the shelterwood harvest while the stand is still uncut or has had a low/midstory shade reduction treatment.…”
Section: The Shelterwood-burn Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Correctly implementing the shelterwood-burn technique (Brose et al 1999a(Brose et al , 1999b) is more than simply applying fire to a partially-cut oak stand. The proper application of the technique actually begins before the shelterwood harvest while the stand is still uncut or has had a low/midstory shade reduction treatment.…”
Section: The Shelterwood-burn Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hot spring burn provides the optimal combination of fire intensity and season of burn for maximum benefit to the oak seedlings (Brose 2010, Brose and Van Lear 1998, Brose et al 1999a). Because such a fire will occur in an oak shelterwood, careful planning is a must.…”
Section: The Shelterwood-burn Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These compositionally unstable oak forests have been documented thoroughly across the eastern United States (e.g., Abrams, 2003). Though oak regeneration has been an object of concern and study for several decades, increasingly poor oak regeneration continues to prompt large scientific efforts to assess the problem and search for management solutions (e.g., Loftis and McGee, 1993;Johnson et al, 2002;McShea and Healy, 2002;Spetich, 2004), including a better understanding of the historic role of fire and the use of prescribed fire in oak forests (Brose et al, 1999(Brose et al, , 2001Iverson et al, 2004a;Dickinson, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future reductions in acorn production from a declining oak component and/or the failure to successfully recruit oak into future forests will have serious implications for both game and nongame species in the region (Wentworth et al 1992, Wolff 1996, McShea 2000, Castleberry et al 2001. Regionally, forest managers are experimenting with preharvest and postharvest prescribed fires to: 1) reduce or inhibit advance regeneration of shade-tolerant, late successional species prior to harvest; 2) select against mast-poor, shade-intolerant species such as yellowpoplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) that show rapid growth characteristics following harvest; and 3) promote oak seedling recruitment preharvest and competitive oak stem retention postharvest (Barnes and Van Lear 1998, Brose and Van Lear 1998, Brose et al 1999. Although the maintenance or enhancement of the oak component usually is beneficial to forest wildlife, the reintroduction of fire in moderate to mesic communities after decades of suppression has unknown effects on many ecosystem attributes, including wildlife (Brose et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%