2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00374-002-0536-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using soil temperature and moisture to predict forest soil nitrogen mineralization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
60
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
60
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Generated linear regression equations included into the leaves of the regression tree model RT125. 1998; Knoepp and Swank, 2002). Whereas maximum mineralization is reported for the forest soil temperature range between 20 and 28 • C (Nicolardot et al, 1994), the mineralization becomes strongly inhibited at temperatures below 10 • C (Knoepp and Swank, 2002).…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Model Results In The Light Of Domain Kmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Generated linear regression equations included into the leaves of the regression tree model RT125. 1998; Knoepp and Swank, 2002). Whereas maximum mineralization is reported for the forest soil temperature range between 20 and 28 • C (Nicolardot et al, 1994), the mineralization becomes strongly inhibited at temperatures below 10 • C (Knoepp and Swank, 2002).…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Model Results In The Light Of Domain Kmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…1998; Knoepp and Swank, 2002). Whereas maximum mineralization is reported for the forest soil temperature range between 20 and 28 • C (Nicolardot et al, 1994), the mineralization becomes strongly inhibited at temperatures below 10 • C (Knoepp and Swank, 2002). Presuming that air temperatures indirectly represent the temperature of the forest soils, the values of avgT 3 >10.1 • C and avgT 14 >11.6 • C, used for splitting in the regression tree model, define the periods of more effective mineralization, nitrification and nitrate accumulation in forest floors, which is in the periods of changed hydrological conditions available for hydrological mobilization.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Model Results In The Light Of Domain Kmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No interaction between air temperature and precipitation were found to significantly affect N leaching or N concentration, though. However, many studies have shown that such interaction is important for N mineralization (Knoepp and Swank, 2002;Cabrera et al, 2005), and likely also for N leaching. In our projections of N leaching, we did not account for such interactions, and the application of our regression models for extrapolating N leaching should therefore be interpreted with due caution.…”
Section: Climate Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrogen (N) mineralization is an important component of nitrogen supply for plant growth [14] and the nutrient dynamics is controlled by the rate of decomposition of organic matter [15]. N-mineralization is of prime importance in ecosystem productivity [12,16], hence for the ecosystem and nutrient cycling, soil nitrogen transformations are measured as indices of potential availability and ecosystem losses of nitrogen [17]. In forest and grassland ecosystems, N-mineralization is affected by the biological factors, such as soil animals, soil microorganisms and plants and the non-biological factors, such as environmental factors and anthropogenic disturbances [12,18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%