2012
DOI: 10.33899/ijvs.2012.67452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using species-specific PCR technique to detect Toxoplasma gondii in broiler chickens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Toxo-DNA prevalence (10.84%.) of the current study is higher than reported from neighboring countries like India (6.06%) [70] and Iran (8%) [71], but lower than reported from Kenya (24-79%) [63,72], and Iraq (26.9%) [73]. The change in prevalence might be due to the differences in geography, climate, the number and age of chickens examined, and sanitation conditions [68].…”
Section: Plos Onecontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Toxo-DNA prevalence (10.84%.) of the current study is higher than reported from neighboring countries like India (6.06%) [70] and Iran (8%) [71], but lower than reported from Kenya (24-79%) [63,72], and Iraq (26.9%) [73]. The change in prevalence might be due to the differences in geography, climate, the number and age of chickens examined, and sanitation conditions [68].…”
Section: Plos Onecontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…In General many study has been performed using the serological and moleculare diagnosis of T. gondii such as (Burg et al, 1989;Al-Sanjary and Hussein, 2012;El-Madawy and Metawea 2013;Al-Abady et al, 2014), all those studies agree with our conclusion that molecular (PCR) is more sensitive and specific tools than the serological tools for the detection of T. gondii parasite . The sensitivity and the specificity of PCR for detecting Toxoplasmosis was measured according to ELISA test as a reference test I@ðuíÜì@bÙŽ îŠ@l@a †@ôr@aeŽ ïéïà@Äbä@ß@bÙnØ@bï‚bóä@bä‹Ùäb"ïånò † ELISA I@ôîóÝî †Šó @ì@H PCR @ß@H Ž ôäbn †ŠíØ@bᎠîŠóèOŽ ôØíè †@bèó Ž îŠbq @@ ón‚íq Z @@ @bï‚bóä@Na ‡äýòˆb÷@ì@Äì‹à@aŠójÄbä †@‹ óÄ@oŽ ïï‚bóä@aeîä‹ @ˆ@óÙŽ ï÷@HíþqíØímI@bÙnØ@bï‚bóä @ˆ@õÄbä I@aŠí‚ó"à@l@çíj'ím@aŠó ó÷ Toxoplama gondii @ì@çi@Äbä@ß@óä‹ @bî@óï‚bóä@Äó÷@a †@õŠíib÷@Ž õŠaíi@ †@NóîH äb"ïånò †@ íiˆ@ ça †@ ãb−ó÷@ óïmbè@ óåïÜíØóÄ@ Äó÷@ Na †aOEóq I@ ôuíÜì@ aeŽ ïÙŽ îŠ@ l@ bÙnØ@ bï‚bóä@ bä‹Ù ELISA @bÙŽ îŠ@ ì@ H I@ôîóÝî †Šó PCR @bî ‡äó¸ójîbm@ì@õŠbïnóè@bä‹ØŠbî †@íi@ôîóÝî †Šó @ì@ôuíÜì@oŽ ïàb−ó÷@bä‹Ø@ †ìaŠói@bòìŠóè@ì@H NôîóÝî †Šó @bÙŽ îŠ @@ ÙäaOE@LõŠóä‹ć ïnŽ ïÄ@aeŽ ïåïÜíØóÄ@Ž ôî@Ûíè †@Ž õŠónäó@ß@ça †@ãb−ó÷@óïmbè@bî@óåïÜíØóÄ@Äó÷ @Ž ôåï‚@aeŽ ïäí¹@•ó'@ímíä@NÛíè †@bîí @ß@Ž ôØíè †@ bèó Ž îŠbq@ß@ônŽ ïÄbèŠói@ aeŽ ïéïà@Äbä@ß@aem‹ Šòì@óåïmbè QP O RPQS @ @bm QP O RPQT @ß@ ç‹ÙàíØ@ óåmbè@ óäí¹@ N Ní‚aOE@ì@çbƒŽ ï'@LÛíè †@LŽ õ‹Øb÷@ß@a †íu@a †íu@aeŽ ïéu @@ @íØ@ôiŠbî †@ôuíÜì@aeŽ ïàb−ó÷ RR I RRNYQ @bÙŽ îŠ@l@çíi@ôåŽ îŠó÷@çbäí¹@ˆ@HE ELISA @Ž ¶ói@L RS I RSNYS @HE @bÙŽ îŠ@l@çíi@ôåŽ îŠó÷ PCR @bÙŽ îŠ@l@õOEóq@båï‚@aeŽ ïäí¹@ôàóè@NŽ õ PCR @ @Ž ôåïu@bånî †@íi@μåÙ"q@óåmbè B1 @ @a−OE@íØòì Nõ‹Ù−bàŠb÷ @@ @aeŽ ïàb−ó÷@aŠói@Äbä †@•bi@bØóî ‡äòíîóq ELISA @ @ì PCR @ @ì †Šóè@aŠójÄbä@ †@ÄbšŠói@aeŽ ïîOEaìbïu@@L´î †@óåmbè@a †@Ž õ @ íØ@ Ž ôàb−ó÷@ Ž õì@ óåïèó @ Ž õ †@ ãó÷@ N´î †@ óåmbéä@ a †bÙŽ îŠ ELISA @ @ ßó † PCR @ @íi@ aei@ •bi@ aeŽ ïÙŽ îŠ@ Ž õ †@ óÅÙć ïq@ Ž õ @ NbÙnØ@ bï‚bóä@ íi@ oìŠ †@ ì@ •bi@ bØóä‹Ùäb"ïånò † PCR @ @ bä‹ØŠbî †@ íi@ ò‹m ‡äó¸ójîbm@ bî Toxoplama @ gondii óè@ ßó † @ bîŠbïn YUNTU @ bî ‡äó¸ójîbmì@ E YWNRY @ aeŽ ïàb−ó÷@ NE PCR @ @aŠìOE@ ñÄbä@ bÙŽ îŠ@ íØ@ póØŠbî †@ Ž õ @bÙŽ îŠ@ˆ@q@Ž ôï‚bóä@l@‹Üóè@aeŽ ïéïà@bä‹Ùäb"ïånò †@íi@óä‹ ELISA N @@ @@ öa †@˜ïƒ"m @ Ûíè †@óÅÐb«@À@óïøî §a@óïåÕnÜa@ì@HaïÜýaI@ðÝ-¾a@˜zÐ@ãa ‡ƒnbi@ãbåÌÿa@À@pbíÕ¾a @ M @âïÝÔg çbn †ŠíØ ó-þ©a Z @@ @Öî‹ @ aeÈ@ kjnî@ ‹¾a@ a‰éi@ óib-fia@ Nçbäfiaì@ pbäaíï¨a@ μi@ óØ"¾a@ óáé¾a@ a‹àÿa@ aeà@ nÉî@ pbíÕ¾a@ öa † ðÜaìÿa@aeà@ðÝïÑi@õì ‡ÉÜa @ Toxoplasma gondii @À@óî †b-nÔýa@óïybåÜa@aeà@óáé¾a@a‹àÿa@aeà@‹¾a@a‰è@nÉî@N òì‹rÜa ãbåÌÿa@ À@ ó-b‚@ óïäaíï¨a @ @ðÝ-¾a@˜zÐ@ óaíi@ ãbåÌÿa@ À@ ‹¾a@˜ïƒ"nÜ@ óïÜb¨a@ óaŠ ‡Üa@ oî‹uc@ NÈb¾aì I ELISA I@óïøî §a@óïåÕnÜa@ì@H PCR @óïåÕnÜa@óÔ ‡Üaì@óïb¨a@ójä@ ‡î ‡znÜ@μ-zÑÜa@þØ@À@w÷bnåÜa@óäŠbÕà@Ú܉Øì@H @Nóïøî §a @@ Ê»@@NÛíè †@óÉàbu@À@@óî‹ïjÜa@tízjÝÜ@Ûíè †@Ø‹à@À@óaŠ ‡Üa@oî‹uc @ @Üa@xbÉåÜa@aeà@ã †@óåïÈ@çíÉmì@ón ßíÝîc@òÑÜa@aeà@Ûíè †@óÅÐb«@À@Þá¨a@òÐ@ßþ‚@o›éuc @ RPQS @ @ßíÝîc@óîbÍÜì RPQT @ò ‡È@aeà@pbåïÉÜa@Ê»@@N @Ní‚aOE@óÕåà@ì@çbƒï'@óÕåà@LÛíè †@óåî ‡à@Ø‹à@Lò‹ÕÈ@óÕåà@Þá"mì@óÅÐba@À@Ö båà @@ I@çì‹"Èì@çbåqýa@aïÜÿa@˜zÐ@ãa ‡ƒnbi@óïÝ-¾a@pb-ízÑÜa@oåïi RRNYQ @p‹éÄc@μy@À@Lóïib°a@w÷bnä@óåïÈ@HE @óïåÕm@ãa ‡ƒnbi@ðøî §a@˜zÑÜa PCR @ I@óåïÈ@çì‹"È@ì@óqþrÜ@óïib°a@w÷bnä RSNYS @ãa ‡ƒnbi@ðøî §a@˜zÑÜa@NHE @óïåÕm PCR @ á¨a@ò †b¾a@™þƒna@ ‡Éi@pbåïÉÜa@Êï»@ôÝÈ@oî‹uc @μu@âm@‹ÍÜ@ ò‹'bjà@ã ‡Üa@aeà@ñìíåÜa@ B1 @N @@ @˜zÐ@ w÷bnä@ μi@ ò ‡ïu@ óÔþÈ@ oïÈc@ óaŠ ‡Üa@ ë‰è ELISA @ @ ì PCR @óÜý †@ À@ Óþn‚a@ ñc@ ÚÜbåè@ aeÙm@ @ N @˜zÐ@ãa ‡ƒna@çdi@óaŠ ‡Üa@ë‰è@aeà@˜ƒÝä@çc@Êïnä@Nμ-zÑÜa@μi@óï÷b-yfia ELISA @ óïåÕm@ Êà PCR @ @ðè Ší-i@ ‹¾a@˜ïƒ"nÜ@ Þràÿa@ óÕî‹Üa @ óïåÕm@ ôÕjm@ Ú܈@ aeà@ âÌ‹Übi@ aeÙÜì@ óÕïÔ †@ ò PCR @ @ aeÈ@ ñ‹znÜ@ ...…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…As the use of the medication throughout pregnancy resulted in improved clinical results. In summary, many zoonotic diseases exist (43)(44)(45)(46)(47); Toxoplasmosis still has many layers still to be unraveled.…”
Section: Toxoplasmosis Trend In Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%