2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using standards to evaluate accountability policy in context: School administrator and teacher perceptions of a teacher evaluation system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This issue is resolved by the letter of the Russian Federation Education and Science Ministry № 03/7480-o dated 28.06.2019, which defines the term "competence" as knowledge, skills and production experience applied and improved in specific conditions, and "qualification" as the official expression of employee technical or professional skills. Also, in the conditions of the professional standard transition, the question about the teacher education mandatory need for each employee from among the teaching staff arose [3]. The letter of the Education and Science Ministry № 03/8750-o explains that employees from the teaching staff are not required to undergo professional retraining in pedagogy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue is resolved by the letter of the Russian Federation Education and Science Ministry № 03/7480-o dated 28.06.2019, which defines the term "competence" as knowledge, skills and production experience applied and improved in specific conditions, and "qualification" as the official expression of employee technical or professional skills. Also, in the conditions of the professional standard transition, the question about the teacher education mandatory need for each employee from among the teaching staff arose [3]. The letter of the Education and Science Ministry № 03/8750-o explains that employees from the teaching staff are not required to undergo professional retraining in pedagogy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivation is the key to development, and to retain teacher morale, teachers' opinions must be included in the system carrying out teacher accountability (Steins et al, 2020). Implications Although research on the technical merits of teacher evaluation systems has been ongoing, fewer studies have examined the perceptions of practitioners regarding the appraisal system (Paufler & Sloat, 2020); this study has contributed in this aspect reflecting not only how stakeholders felt, but also commenting on the overall effectiveness of the system. It is included that the overall effectiveness of the appraisal system is not impressive since it is not resulting in teacher motivation for self-improvement or satisfaction and commitment with the system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its popularity in over 20 countries is based on its uniform evaluation for teachers, principals, and leaders, its comprehensiveness and easy implementation of its seven research-based professional standards custom design for teachers, result-based standards for assessing students' progress and promoting instructional accountability (Stronge and Tonneson, 2012). Lastly, a study has focused on teachers' attitudes toward an evaluation system (Paufler and Sloat, 2020). A similar study in the Iranian EFL context revealed that items such as transparency, fairness, multiple measurement, formative evaluation, and cognizance of unequal power relations are critical for an effective evaluation system (Mazandarani and Troudi, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%