2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2013.10.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using STR, MiniSTR and SNP markers to solve complex cases of kinship analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the combined STR/ SNP increased PI results, leading to a strongly supported hypothesis of paternity and an accurate conclusion. Similar results when applied to complex casework resolution have been obtained with SNP typing by other authors [6,[13][14][15] -hardly a surprise, since this methodology accomplishes the single-tube-reaction study of a great number of markers. Additionally, these markers show an extremely low mutation rate, and those on the SNPforID 52plex have been selected to cover all chromosomes with an ample distribution across the genome in order to ensure the discovery of recombination-born differences even among members of complex inbred pedigrees [6].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Moreover, the combined STR/ SNP increased PI results, leading to a strongly supported hypothesis of paternity and an accurate conclusion. Similar results when applied to complex casework resolution have been obtained with SNP typing by other authors [6,[13][14][15] -hardly a surprise, since this methodology accomplishes the single-tube-reaction study of a great number of markers. Additionally, these markers show an extremely low mutation rate, and those on the SNPforID 52plex have been selected to cover all chromosomes with an ample distribution across the genome in order to ensure the discovery of recombination-born differences even among members of complex inbred pedigrees [6].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…However, the PI values obtained after the additional information from the diverse sets of SNP markers, used by the different laboratories, in all the analyzed cases (Table I) was very useful. This clearly illustrates that the addition of SNPs can help to reach a higher degree of confidence in the interpretation of many challenging relationship tests that were first processed using extended STR and, in some cases MiniSTR or Y-STR typing [36]. This is particularly important in parentage or identification cases that involve the analysis of complex DNA samples extracted from bones and teeth.…”
Section: Wynikimentioning
confidence: 96%
“…I). Można zatem jednoznacznie stwierdzić, że dodatkowe wykorzystanie SNP może zwiększać poziom ufności przy interpretacji wyników w wielu trudnych przypadkach dotyczących pokrewieństwa, które analizowano początkowo przy użyciu rozszerzonego badania STR lub typowania MiniSTR albo Y-STR [36]. Jest to szczególnie istotne w przypadkach dotyczących rodzicielstwa lub identyfikacji osoby, w których analizowane są kompleksowe próbki DNA pozyskiwanego z kości i zębów.…”
Section: Wynikiunclassified