“…To capture individual differences in pathways (e.g., why do some neurodevelopmentally vulnerable young children develop adaptively, what factors determine which children will have normative pathways), we must go beyond risk to effectively capture compensatory factors. While ecological protective factors are central to this (National Association for the Education of Young Children, 2004 ), our focus here is on ensuring that the HBCD neurodevelopmental assessment strategy moves beyond a deficit orientation to include a strengths-based focus which captures developmental strengths, wellbeing, and positive health (Fenton, Walsh, Wong, & Cumming, 2015 ; Forrest, Blackwell, & Camargo Jr., 2018 ; Restoule, Hopkins, Robinson, & Wiebe, 2015 ). This includes measuring the full spectrum of child capacities (not merely above or below a threshold), developmental domains that may serve a compensatory function when neurodevelopmental vulnerability is present (e.g., language, sociability), and indicators of well-being (e.g., engagement, curiosity, persistence) (Blackwell et al, 2020 ; Moreno & Robinson, 2005 ; Roben, Cole, & Armstrong, 2013 ).…”