When learning new concepts, students tend to use either exemplar-based learning strategies (e.g., memorizing specific examples) or rule-based learning strategies (e.g., abstracting general rules). Prior research suggests that participants' strategy choices during learning depend on individuals' preexisting learning tendencies, with some people being exemplar learners and others rule learners. Yet, strategy choices are also influenced by how the study materials are taught (rule-focused or exemplar-focused). The present study examined how these two factors interact using an alphanumeric symbol addition task. We examined whether exemplar learners would switch to using rule-based strategies when given rule-focused training and if rule learners would fail to learn the rule when given exemplar-focused training. We found that both rule and exemplar learners used a rule-based strategy after a rule-focused training and neither group learned the rule after an exemplar-focused training. Our results suggest that individuals can be shaped to adopt either rule-based or exemplar-based strategies during learning, regardless of their inherent learning tendencies.
Public Significance StatementPast studies examining individual differences in learning styles highlighted the disadvantage "exemplar learners" face in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics disciplines. Unlike rule learners, exemplar learners struggle with rule-based knowledge transfer, leading to poor test performance when testing does not match their practice experiences. Our present study examined if rule learning can be facilitated with rule-focused training. Individuals who were identified as rule and exemplar learners were given a symbol addition task where the underlying rule was either emphasized or hidden from the participants. Our results showed that with training, exemplar learners can successfully learn rule-based materials and demonstrate knowledge transfer.