2020
DOI: 10.1080/08880018.2020.1779886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using surveillance to determine the number of individuals with sickle cell disease in California and Georgia, 2005–2016

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite these challenges, the efforts were continued through donations, and these data have been used to raise SCD awareness and to inform researchers, stakeholders, and clinicians about the natural course of SCD and to highlight the many areas where additional information and follow-up are needed. 20,26,33 Importantly, these findings more clearly demonstrated the health inequities for those living with SCD compared with other similarly severe, inherited, and less-common diseases.…”
Section: Jama Health Forum | Special Communicationmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Despite these challenges, the efforts were continued through donations, and these data have been used to raise SCD awareness and to inform researchers, stakeholders, and clinicians about the natural course of SCD and to highlight the many areas where additional information and follow-up are needed. 20,26,33 Importantly, these findings more clearly demonstrated the health inequities for those living with SCD compared with other similarly severe, inherited, and less-common diseases.…”
Section: Jama Health Forum | Special Communicationmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The program contributed previously unknown information, such as the incidence and prevalence of SCD in these 7 states and further demonstrated the use, complexity, and limitations of linking multiple data sources-newborn screening, vital records, clinical case reports, and administrative data-for understanding SCD morbidity and mortality trends, clinical characteristics, and health care resource utilization and identifying unmet needs. [25][26][27] Because of limited funding, 24 following RuSH, the CDC's Public Health, Research, Epidemiology, and Surveillance in Hemoglobinopathies (PHRESH) project only continued surveillance work in California and Georgia. Designed to further validate SCD case definitions and data integration methods as well as to disseminate SCD surveillance data, PHRESH refined the surveillance definition of SCD and demonstrated the use and challenges of studying SCD using administrative data.…”
Section: Jama Health Forum | Special Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…9,10 The SCDC program collects health information on all people living with SCD to study long-term trends in prevalence, geographic distribution, treatment, and access to quality care in these 2 states. 11,12 The California and Georgia programs have developed population-based cohorts of people living with SCD by linking multiple state-specific datasets, such as NBS and vital records, clinical databases, and administrative claims. 13,14 These cohorts were developed by using validated surveillance case definitions to identify people living with SCD in each state.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%