2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.euprot.2014.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using synthetic peptides to benchmark peptide identification software and search parameters for MS/MS data analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyzing a sufficiently large set of MS2 spectra with different peptide and protein identification (ID) engines, including database search engines, generally gives partially different, often complementary results. 28 To take advantage of this, OpenMS provides the ConsensusID tool, which combines search results on the PSM level from different ID engines. Given ranked lists of PSMs produced by different engines, several algorithms are available to merge and rescore PSMs derived from the same spectrum: similarity scoring based on sequence or fragmentation pattern similarity, 29 ranked voting, or simply using the average or the best score for each peptide.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyzing a sufficiently large set of MS2 spectra with different peptide and protein identification (ID) engines, including database search engines, generally gives partially different, often complementary results. 28 To take advantage of this, OpenMS provides the ConsensusID tool, which combines search results on the PSM level from different ID engines. Given ranked lists of PSMs produced by different engines, several algorithms are available to merge and rescore PSMs derived from the same spectrum: similarity scoring based on sequence or fragmentation pattern similarity, 29 ranked voting, or simply using the average or the best score for each peptide.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, to provide a comprehensive overview of the miracidia proteome, we combined the results of four search engines to assess the MS/MS spectral data. The outcome indicated distinct variations in protein identification dependent on the search engine (see Fig 1B ), which could be attributed to differences in search algorithms and associated parameter settings [ 43 ]. This is supported by a recent benchmark study that used a pool of 20,103 synthetic peptides to evaluate peptide-spectrum matches (PSMs) using two different LCMS systems followed by the analysis with 1,800 different search engine and parameter set combinations [ 43 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome indicated distinct variations in protein identification dependent on the search engine (see Fig 1B ), which could be attributed to differences in search algorithms and associated parameter settings [ 43 ]. This is supported by a recent benchmark study that used a pool of 20,103 synthetic peptides to evaluate peptide-spectrum matches (PSMs) using two different LCMS systems followed by the analysis with 1,800 different search engine and parameter set combinations [ 43 ]. That study found that the choice of parameter settings had a large influence on the identification performance of the search engine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 ) [65]. Tandem mass spectra were searched against the UniProt _ Oryza sativa (63,195 sequences) concatenated with reverse decoy database.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%