Using tables to enhance trustworthiness in qualitative research

Cloutier, Charlotte; Ravasi, Davide

doi:10.1177/1476127020979329

Cited by 140 publications

(82 citation statements)

References 72 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, the proposed policy not only increases the credibility of the management and organization discipline, but also contributes to leveling the playing field. Furthermore, in response to the credibility crisis, qualitative scholars have been busy devising alternative transparency-ensuring techniques (O'Kane, Smith, and Lerman 2021;Cloutier and Ravasi 2021;Pratt, Kaplan, and Whittington 2020;Plakoyiannaki and Budhwar 2021;Grodal, Anteby, and Holm 2021) that consider quality criteria relevant for assessing such research (Lincoln and Guba 1985). Thus, the requirements seem to increase for all research designs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dissecting the tension of open science standards implementation in management and organization journals

Hensel

2021

Accountability in Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Growing concerns about the credibility of scientific findings have sparked a debate on new transparency and openness standards in research. Management and organization studies scholars generally support the new standards, while emphasizing the unique challenges associated with their implementation in this paradigmatically diverse discipline. In this study, I analyze the costs to authors and journals associated with the implementation of new transparency and openness standards, and provide a progress report on the implementation level thus far. Drawing on an analysis of the submission guidelines of 60 empirical management journals, I find that the call for greater transparency was received, but resulted in implementations that were limited in scope and depth. Even standards that could have been easily adopted were left unimplemented, producing a paradoxical situation in which research designs that need transparency standards the most are not exposed to any, likely because the standards are irrelevant to other research designs.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dissecting the tension of open science standards implementation in management and organization journals

Hensel

2021

Accountability in Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Analysis of the statements and their iteration with other data began thus to reveal temporal narratives of events at play to us, flavoured by the cultural biases of our informants, yet collectively neutral in approaching the original sequences of events (Schein, 1991). We increasingly came to understand and learned to streamline our originally somewhat unfocused topic of scientific inquiry with established qualitative research procedures and protocols towards a relevant innovation model and scientifically rigorous findings (Cloutier & Ravasi, 2021; von Krogh et al, 2012). We repeatedly triangulated our data for internal consistency, credibility, validity and increased reliability (Brinberg & McGrath, 1985; Yin, 2003).…”

Section: Research Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We repeatedly triangulated our data for internal consistency, credibility, validity and increased reliability (Brinberg & McGrath, 1985; Yin, 2003). Thus, we did not as much ‘manipulate the data’ (Miles & Huberman, 1994) as we did (1) categorize interview data into first‐order codes in line with conventional innovation‐management language (Table 2); (2) contextualize the data and first‐order codes into second‐order themes to identify the more general context, factors and relationships and (3) document and capture the variables of interest in aggregate dimensions for our conceptual framework and explanation of the phenomenon that we have been studying (Cloutier & Ravasi, 2021; Gioia et al, 2013; Yin, 2003). As is often the case in qualitative research, more than once we came across something even more interesting than what we had learned earlier and revisited and even changed our theoretical ideas (Alvesson & Sandberg, 2012; Davis, 1971; Whyte, 1999).…”

Section: Research Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

Radical circles and visionary innovation: Angry birds and the transformation of video games

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Radical circle is an innovation approach, alternative in comparison to innovation teams and innovation communities, superior to these when detailed managerial guidance is not readily available because of high uncertainty, high ambiguity, or both. Through an empirical case analysis of Angry Birds, the video game, we strengthen earlier radical‐circle research findings on how a common sense of malaise with a current situation and dominant visions sometimes a small group of creative individuals meaningfully together, each volunteering to contribute much to change situation and dominant meaningfully vision. We find in this case that radical circles were more fluid in their membership and boundaries than what these earlier studies have found. There was considerable change over time in both the radical circles and visionary innovation. After Angry Birds's launch, a huge and very active brand community ensued, with radical creativity, with innovative community members contributing meaningful new inputs both for free and for global market and industry transformation. We call for further research on why and how line‐up changes in radical circles in between times of original visionary innovation and later‐phase market and industry transformation may matter. We also call for further research to study in what kinds of situations, why, and how radical circles are a good approach to mobilize extra‐organizational volunteers for visionary innovation of new‐to‐the world products or processes.

show abstract

“…This study abided by the criteria of credibility, transferability, dependability and confirmability – the trustworthiness criteria (Table 3). We took several strategic steps to increase transparency (Cloutier and Ravasi 2021).…”

Section: The Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Experiences of parents of adolescents with intellectual disabilities regarding the transition to sexual development: A transitions theory‐based qualitative study

Karataş

Dalgıç

2021

J intellect Disabil Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background To describe of the experiences of parents regarding the transition to sexual development of their adolescents with intellectual disabilities who are 15–19 years old. Methods This study employs a descriptive interpretative approach and uses Meleis's transitions theory as its theoretical frame of reference. This study uses purposive sampling methods for recruitment. We collected data through individual semi‐structured interviews (n = 11) and researcher observations between February 2021 and April 2021 and employed an inductive content analysis approach. Results Three main themes emerged from the data: parental factors driving the transition process, parents' needs regarding the transition process, and outcomes of the transition process. In addition, most parents struggled to remodel their identities following the transition due to concerns over their adolescent's ability to cope with the challenges of adulthood. Conclusion Considered in the context of middle‐range transitions theory, we suggest that parental experiences regarding adolescents' transition to sexual development stem from varying levels of uncertainty and depend on the situation, preferences, and family needs of each individual parent. It is useful to utilise Meleis's transitions theory to understand deeply and explore the impact of the sexual development of adolescents with intellectual disabilities on parents.

show abstract

Using tables to enhance trustworthiness in qualitative research

Cited by 140 publications

References 72 publications

Dissecting the tension of open science standards implementation in management and organization journals

Dissecting the tension of open science standards implementation in management and organization journals

Radical circles and visionary innovation: Angry birds and the transformation of video games

Experiences of parents of adolescents with intellectual disabilities regarding the transition to sexual development: A transitions theory‐based qualitative study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About