Using Team Building Methods With an Ice Hockey Team: An Action Research Case Study

Rovio, Esa; Arvinen-Barrow, Monna; Weigand, Daniel A.; Eskola, Jari; Lintunen, Taru

doi:10.1123/tsp.26.4.584

Cited by 15 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Attributes are recurring themes in the literature that describe the essential aspects as a concept (Walker & Avant, 2005). Psychological safety was associated with physical safety when referring to the NRCIM criteria in a number of articles without further elaboration (Butterfield et al, 1991;Camire, 2014;Carpentier & Mageau, 2013;Erhardt et al, 2014;Henriksen et al, 2019;Johnston et al, 2013;Kavanagh et al, 2016;Kavanagh et al, 2017;Morgan et al, 2019;Perkins & Naam, 2007;Petitpas et al, 2017;Rovio et al, 2012;Schroeder, 2010;Teng & Wang, 2020). Within this category, six themes were generated,…”

Section: Defining Attributesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychological safety in sport: a systematic review and concept analysis

Sutcliffe

Mayland

Schweickle

et al. 2022

International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There has been a rapid proliferation of empirical research on the relationship between sport participation and mental health. As a result of this movement, there has been an increased focus on the constructs that can predict or explain mental health outcomes in sport.Psychological safety in sport is among the constructs surfaced in the movement. Despite this, there is a considerable lack of conceptual clarity regarding how to define psychological safety and how it can be fostered in sport. As such, the aim of this study was to provide conceptual clarity of the term psychological safety in the context of sport. To achieve this aim, we first systematically searched for all currently available studies that have discussed psychological safety in a sport context. Then, a concept analysis approach was applied wherein the definitions, attributes, antecedents, and consequences were thematically analysed across 67 studies. As a result of this synthesis, psychological safety in sport was conceptualised as a continuous, group level construct that is perceived (and reported) at an individual level. We also provide a descriptive model of psychological safety in sport that we hope lends clarity and debate to the field moving forward.

show abstract

Section: Defining Attributesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychological safety in sport: a systematic review and concept analysis

Sutcliffe

Mayland

Schweickle

et al. 2022

International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…본 연구에서 진행된 팀빌딩프로그램은 먼저 선행연구에서 활용되었 던 팀빌딩 프로그램 (Kim, 2008;Kim & Kim, 2012;Rovio et al, 2012;Senecal et al, 2008;Voight & Callaghan, 2001)…”

Section: 연구절차unclassified

“…실제로 스포츠심리학에서 팀빌딩 중재는 축구 (Leo et al, 2021;Martin & Davids, 1995;Prapavessis et al, 1996;Voight & Callaghan, 2001), 야구 (Alonso et al, 1997;Hochi et al, 2017;Rainey & Schweickert, 1988), 농구 (Senecal et al, 2008), 체조 (McClure & Foster, 1991), 승마 (Bloom & Stevens, 2002), 아이 스하키 (Bruner et al, 2020;Rovio et al, 2012) 등 여러 다양한 종목에서 활용되었다. 국내에서도 축구 (Hwang, 2017;Kim, 2008) 와 야구 (Kim & Kim, 2012), 핸드볼 (Kwon, 2022) (Ji, 2007;Shim & Shin, 2015).…”

unclassified

The Application of a Team-Building Program for Team Match in the National Archery Team

Kim¹,

Kim²

2022

Korean J Sport Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PURPOSE This study aimed to apply a team-building program for preparing the national archery team for competition in the Olympics. METHODS To achieve the purpose of this study, six national archers (three men and three women) were included. The team-building program was applied for a total 6 sessions (one session per week). Group cohesion and efficacy were measured three times before, after, and at a later application of the program. The collected data were analyzed with the Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, which are nonparametric statistical techniques for data analysis. In addition, an in-depth interview for qualitative data was conducted for each archer to explore the effects and changes resulting from participation in the program. RESULTS The results of the study are as follows: first, the levels of team cohesion and efficacy in the national archery team increased after the implementation of the program compared to those in the pre-implementation state. Furthermore, high levels of team cohesion and efficacy were maintained at the follow-up measurement. Second, the archers recognized that closeness and faith in one another increased more between team members. Furthermore, there were positive changes in team communication, atmosphere, cohesion, and efficacy during team matches. CONCLUSIONS The team-building program applied in this study was found to have a positive effect on various factors related to team cohesion, such as team communication and team atmosphere. Therefore, future studies should consider developing a team-building program that can contribute to improving team sport performance for different sports and the effects of the program should be examined using various methods.

show abstract

“…Although action research is well established in mainstream social science, the dearth of action research by sport scholars is noteworthy. A search of online databases finds few studies in established sociology of sport journals that are framed as action research (e.g., Blodgett et al, 2011), and only a few more in complementary sport studies disciplines, such as sport psychology (e.g., Rovio et al, 2012) and sport management (e.g., Frisby et al, 1997). The simultaneous engagement of theory with practice is not yet adequately developed in our field.…”

Section: Future Directions For the Sociology Of Sport: On Theory Relementioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the sociology of sport: On theory relevance and action research

Chalip

2015

International Review for the Sociology of Sport

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

On the 50th anniversary of the ISSA and IRSS, one of the leading scholars of the study of sport organizations, management, and policy, Laurence Chalip, considers the crucial intersection of the sociology of sport with its applications in the real world. Reflecting on how a 1989 call for the development of an applied sociology of sport by Yiannakis was not well-received by a sociology of sport scholarly community (concerned that political and marketplace imperatives might diminish its interpretive and critical agenda) Chalip outlines pragmatic and moral grounds for needing an applied sociology of sport. Posing that the challenges of the sociology of sport entail both embracing the nexus of application and theory, and the development of new conceptual tools, it is argued that an applied sociology of sport can, counter to conventional wisdom, challenge the status and functioning of privilege and power in sport. A key challenge of servicing clients in consultancies and applications is realizing that applied sociology of sport cannot be a-theoretical, but instead demands being multiply theoretical. Looking to the future, it is noted that the dearth of action research by sport scholars has been noteworthy, and that the simultaneous engagement of theory with practice, which has been inadequately developed, represents an opportunity that should not be missed. Keywordsaction research, applied sociology of sport, social theory, sociology of sport, theory/practice dialectics Reflections on the trajectory of the sociology of sportOver a quarter of a century ago Andrew Yiannakis (1989) issued a call for development of an applied sociology of sport. His vision called for the sociology of sport to address problems of sport practitioners, including teachers, coaches, marketers, and policymakers. Although others (e.g., Melnick, 1981) had previously explored the idea that the sociology

show abstract

Using Team Building Methods With an Ice Hockey Team: An Action Research Case Study

Cited by 15 publications

References 25 publications

Psychological safety in sport: a systematic review and concept analysis

Psychological safety in sport: a systematic review and concept analysis

The Application of a Team-Building Program for Team Match in the National Archery Team

Assessing the sociology of sport: On theory relevance and action research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About