2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-01891-6_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Term-Matching Algorithms for the Annotation of Geo-services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• The second technique did not use the ILPnet2 collection and relied on Google web search instead [9]. A query was generated from each term t by taking its words and attaching an extra keyword "ILP" to limit the search to ILP related web pages.…”
Section: Populating the Terms And Keyword Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The second technique did not use the ILPnet2 collection and relied on Google web search instead [9]. A query was generated from each term t by taking its words and attaching an extra keyword "ILP" to limit the search to ILP related web pages.…”
Section: Populating the Terms And Keyword Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the geographical information representation, an ontologies-based approach that is structured to allow feature and event attributes to represent meaning in class rules and relationships is required (Grossner, Goodchild, and Clarke 2008). In this sense, there is experience related to the capture of ontologies operational at the time of data production (Comber, Fisher, and Wadsworth 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grcar and Klien define semantic annotation as "the task of matching an arbitrary word or term with the most appropriate concept in the corresponding domain ontology" (Grcar and Klien 2007). Klien and Lutz (2005) proposed a method to automate the semantic annotation process based on spatial relations, using the specific characteristics of geographical information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations