2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18031361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the CES-D-7 as a Screening Instrument to Detect Major Depression among the Inmate Population

Abstract: Major depression is one of the most prevalent mental health problems in the penitentiary context and has been related to different undesirable outcomes. The aim of the current research was to evaluate the utility of screening tools for major depression brief assessment in the jail context. We interviewed 203 male inmates and complimented the MCMI-III, the SCL-90-R, and the CES-D-7 self-informed scales. Major depression syndrome and disorder were determined based on MCMI-III criteria and the capability of SCL-9… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depressive mood. We used a 7-item validated version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CESD; Herrero & Gracia, 2007;Juarros-Basterretxea et al, 2021). The CESD-7 scale is a short self-report scale designed to measure depressive symptomatology in the general population.…”
Section: Variables and Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depressive mood. We used a 7-item validated version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CESD; Herrero & Gracia, 2007;Juarros-Basterretxea et al, 2021). The CESD-7 scale is a short self-report scale designed to measure depressive symptomatology in the general population.…”
Section: Variables and Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…National jail healthcare accreditation organizations recommend mental health screenings for active suicidality (Berman & Canning, 2021 ; Folsom et al, 2006 ), or signs of schizophrenia (e.g., hallucinations) (Folsom et al, 2006 ), but there is less clarity in recommendations for screening for anxiety, depression, or trauma-related illnesses. When jails implement screening for mental illness, it is often part of a quality improvement, or implementation project, and even when successful, the experiences of jails are infrequently adopted by other jails (Gibbons et al, 2019 ; Juarros-Basterretxea et al, 2021 ; Proctor et al, 2021 ). The barriers in converting efficacious screening tools are likely multi-factorial, related to limited financial and administrative resources (Morris & Edwards, 2022 ), and de-prioritization of mental health due to competing health issues (Binswanger et al, 2009 ; Udo, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Likert-type scale consists of 7 items that measure aspects related to depression symptoms, with a response range from 1 (never) to 4 (always), (e.g., "In the last month, I felt as if I could not shake off the sadness, even with the help of my family or friends"). Previous studies have highlighted the adequate psychometric properties of the instrument across ages (Crockett et al, 2005;Herrero & Gracia, 2007;Juarros-Basterretxea et al, 2021). In this study we used an overall score for the scale to assess the general depressive symptoms experienced by students, adding the scores (reverse items were recoded), ranging from 7 to 28, and then dividing by the number of items ( 7) to obtain a final range from 1 to 4.…”
Section: Depressive Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%