2021
DOI: 10.1002/aur.2638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the Clinical Global Impression scale to assess social communication change in minimally verbal children with autism spectrum disorder

Abstract: Assessing improvements in social communication behaviors in minimally verbal children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is often challenging. The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) is a 7‐point scale that has been adapted so that clinicians can easily and quickly rate social communication behaviors. The current study evaluated the CGI‐Improvement (CGI‐I) subscale as a measure of social communication change in minimally verbal children with ASD. The sample included 54 minimally verbal school‐age children … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study evaluated if neuroimaging findings were associated with DSRD clinical response to therapies (antidepressants, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, ECT, or immunotherapy) commonly used to treat this condition 5,7 . Clinical response was evaluated using validated metrics including the NPI‐Q, 11 BFCRS, 12,13 25FW, 14 and CGI 15 . Clinical response was classified as a greater than 50% improvement in two of four assessment tools at 12 weeks after treatment initiation (compared to baseline, pretreatment score).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study evaluated if neuroimaging findings were associated with DSRD clinical response to therapies (antidepressants, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, ECT, or immunotherapy) commonly used to treat this condition 5,7 . Clinical response was evaluated using validated metrics including the NPI‐Q, 11 BFCRS, 12,13 25FW, 14 and CGI 15 . Clinical response was classified as a greater than 50% improvement in two of four assessment tools at 12 weeks after treatment initiation (compared to baseline, pretreatment score).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 5 , 7 Clinical response was evaluated using validated metrics including the NPI‐Q, 11 BFCRS, 12 , 13 25FW, 14 and CGI. 15 Clinical response was classified as a greater than 50% improvement in two of four assessment tools at 12 weeks after treatment initiation (compared to baseline, pretreatment score). Responses were coded as a binary response or no response.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcome measures used in intervention research commonly rely on caregiver or clinician reports which can be problematic due to the likelihood of systematic measurement error, expectancy bias or placebo effects (Anagnostou et al, 2015 ; Sandbank et al, 2020 ). The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) rating scales (Busner & Targum, 2007 ), one of the most commonly used outcome measures in intervention research (Bolte & Diehl, 2013 ; Toolan et al, 2022 ), is a subjective measure of relative improvement completed by clinicians. In the case of some behavioral interventions, the CGI is completed by the clinician responsible for delivering treatment, in part because this mirrors typical clinical practice.…”
Section: Limitations Of Previously Used Outcome Measures In Intervent...mentioning
confidence: 99%