2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10841-022-00377-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the ecological relationships of Odonata with a habitat integrity index to test the biodiversity ecosystem function framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Odonates are distributed in the environment according to a wide range of ecophyisiological requirements ( Vilela et al 2016), and the sampled areas were shown to be highly heterogenous, mainly due to the following characteristics: i) the presence of lentic and lotic freshwater environments with more or less exposure to light, which directly affects the thermoregulation of these animals ( De Marco et al 2005; Vilela et al 2016); ii) degree of conservation, diversity of ecosystems, and integrity of riparian vegetation ( Carvalho et al . 2013; Rodrigues et al 2016; Brasil et al 2020); iii) the existence of areas with greater or lesser human impact; and iv) a mosaic of regeneration stages, represented by areas of reforestation and primary forests, which influences the composition of Odonata communities ( Brito et al 2021; Silva et al 2021; Gomez-Tolosa et al 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Odonates are distributed in the environment according to a wide range of ecophyisiological requirements ( Vilela et al 2016), and the sampled areas were shown to be highly heterogenous, mainly due to the following characteristics: i) the presence of lentic and lotic freshwater environments with more or less exposure to light, which directly affects the thermoregulation of these animals ( De Marco et al 2005; Vilela et al 2016); ii) degree of conservation, diversity of ecosystems, and integrity of riparian vegetation ( Carvalho et al . 2013; Rodrigues et al 2016; Brasil et al 2020); iii) the existence of areas with greater or lesser human impact; and iv) a mosaic of regeneration stages, represented by areas of reforestation and primary forests, which influences the composition of Odonata communities ( Brito et al 2021; Silva et al 2021; Gomez-Tolosa et al 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the effects for Anisoptera would be exactly the inverse of those found for Zygoptera (Supplementary Material 4). To analyze whether the Zygoptera/Anisoptera ratio is robust enough to reflect differences in the pattern of Odonata response to habitat degradation, we compared the performance of Zygoptera/Anisoptera with ratios at a finer scale (i.e., at the family and genus levels) following the proposals of Šigutová et al (2019) and Gómez-Tolosa et al (2022). To do so, we identified the family and genera with the greatest abundance of individuals and highest species richness for all the assemblage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This emphasizes the significance of examin-ing both community structures and specificities at a regional scale so that the most appropriate indicator can be employed. For instance, studies conducted by Gómez-Tolosa et al (2022) in Mexico and Mendoza-Penagos et al (2021) in the Brazilian Amazon utilized family and genera level for analysis. In ours, we demonstrated the robustness of the Zygoptera/Anisoptera ratio in capturing shifts within Odonata communities caused by habitat degradation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%