2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the functional resonance analysis method on the drug administration process to assess performance variability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
71
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the analyzed studies indicated that there are approaches for validating FRAM models (Buikstra et al, 2020; Kaya et al, 2019; O'Hara et al, 2020). Workshop, meeting, group discussion, and interview with expert were used by 11.5% (6 out of 52) of the analyzed studies to validate constructed FRAM models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the analyzed studies indicated that there are approaches for validating FRAM models (Buikstra et al, 2020; Kaya et al, 2019; O'Hara et al, 2020). Workshop, meeting, group discussion, and interview with expert were used by 11.5% (6 out of 52) of the analyzed studies to validate constructed FRAM models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that accident/incident investigation report was the most popular approach in aviation-related studies as it was employed by 70% (7 out of 10) of the investigated studies in the aviation domain (Tables 3 and 4). Conducting interviews with experts to validate the outcomes of developed FRAM models was highlighted by Kaya et al (2019) and Bridges et al (2018). Workshop is another appropriate approach for validating the reliability of developed FRAM models (Ross et al, 2018).…”
Section: Other Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is not a surprising result since FRAM was developed in the aeronautical field. Other emerging sectors are healthcare (13,99%) and industrial operations (12,44%) as demonstrated by several publications [14][15][16]. Furthermore, some authors pointed out that FRAM does not assess the human behavior and the human performance to analyze the human error [17,18].…”
Section: General Overview On Resilience Engineering Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other publications demonstrated how FRAM is a qualitative approach for accident, risk and system analysis and it does not support quantification [19][20][21]. Definitely, FRAM is a qualitative method.…”
Section: General Overview On Resilience Engineering Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%