2017
DOI: 10.1007/s13593-017-0420-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the green purchase method to help farmers escape the poverty trap in semiarid China

Abstract: People who live in ecologically fragile environments face both poverty and environmental degradation, which reinforce each other and create a "poverty trap." Traditional ecological restoration projects focus only on ecological measures, and thus ignore the livelihoods of local residents. Those projects therefore fail to solve the poverty trap. In addition, project subsidies to residents typically end when the projects end, thus forcing residents to return to their old way of life and reversing the gains from t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4), including place and livelihood detachment, food or tenure insecurity risks, deteriorating social relations or the emergence of conflict, and the loss of cultural practices, which may disproportionately harm vulnerable social groups (Xu et al 2009, Celentano et al 2014. For example, a case presented as positive for both well-being and conservation involved the relocation of communities by the Chinese State to allow for forests to regenerate, which, eventually, they did (Cao et al 2017). The communities were offered incentives to take up alternative livelihoods, often involving migration to urban areas, which was concluded to have enhanced people's income-earning potential.…”
Section: Imposed Conservation Can Be Ecologically Effective But At Great Social and Financial Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4), including place and livelihood detachment, food or tenure insecurity risks, deteriorating social relations or the emergence of conflict, and the loss of cultural practices, which may disproportionately harm vulnerable social groups (Xu et al 2009, Celentano et al 2014. For example, a case presented as positive for both well-being and conservation involved the relocation of communities by the Chinese State to allow for forests to regenerate, which, eventually, they did (Cao et al 2017). The communities were offered incentives to take up alternative livelihoods, often involving migration to urban areas, which was concluded to have enhanced people's income-earning potential.…”
Section: Imposed Conservation Can Be Ecologically Effective But At Great Social and Financial Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Davidia involucrata , which were likely shaped by both pre‐Quaternary and Pleistocene climatic changes (Sun et al., 2015; Xiong, Xiao, et al., 2019). However, the main adaptive management goals of current conservation policies are to expand the coverage of the protected area and establish regular patrols coupled to decentralized household monitoring (Cao et al., 2017). None of these methods can help to protect rare species (Brockerhoff et al., 2013) in GPNP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From 1999 to 2016, the area in which soil and water conservation had been implemented amounted to 2.9 × 10 3 km 2 , the area of fruit trees and other economic forests reached 869 km 2 , the vegetation cover increased by 29.1%, and the vegetation growth rate was twice the average for the rest of Shaanxi Province. Sales of this fruit accounted for 66.9% of total rural income, and the per capita income of residents increased to 10.6 × 10 3 RMB in 2016 (Cao, Zheng, et al, 2017).…”
Section: Yan'an: Soil and Water Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meeting this goal can interfere with the driving forces that increase degradation and strengthen the poverty trap. This could be accomplished by promoting the development of green industries that both increase income and improve the livelihood of residents of programme areas (Biagini & Miller, 2013), and could promote ecological restoration, thereby promoting sustainable development (Cao, Zheng, Chen, Ma, & Xia, 2017). This works because when income increases sufficiently, residents become more willing to protect their environment, leading to improvement of that environment (Zhang, Luo, & Cao, 2018).…”
Section: Mechanisms Behind the Poverty Trapmentioning
confidence: 99%