2021
DOI: 10.1080/01639374.2021.2012310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the Cataloguing Code of Ethics Principles for a Retrospective Project Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Yon and Willey used the Code to evaluate one of their past metadata projects to determine if the work could have been done more ethically. 23 Others have mentioned the Code as justification or inspiration for more ethical cataloging standards and practices, such as OCLC's Reimagine Descriptive Workflows report 24 and the Trans Metadata Collective's Metadata Best Practices for Trans and Gender Diverse Resources. 25 It has also been included in some library institutional collection development policies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Yon and Willey used the Code to evaluate one of their past metadata projects to determine if the work could have been done more ethically. 23 Others have mentioned the Code as justification or inspiration for more ethical cataloging standards and practices, such as OCLC's Reimagine Descriptive Workflows report 24 and the Trans Metadata Collective's Metadata Best Practices for Trans and Gender Diverse Resources. 25 It has also been included in some library institutional collection development policies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%