Using the Z-score to analyze the financial soundness of insurance firms

Abstract

PurposeDespite the sophisticated regulatory regime established in Solvency II, analysts should be able to consider other less complex indicators of the soundness of insurers. The Z-score measure, which has traditionally been used as a proxy of individual risk in the banking sector, may be a useful tool when applied in the insurance sector. However, different methods for calculating this indicator have been proposed in the literature. This paper compares six different Z-score approaches to examine which one best fits insurance companies. The authors use a final dataset of 183 firms (1,382 observations) operating in the Spanish insurance sector during the period 2010–2017.Design/methodology/approachIn the first stage, the authors opt for a root mean squared error (RMSE) criterion to evaluate which of the various mean and SD estimates that are used to compute the Z-score best fits the data. In the second stage, the authors estimate and compare the explanatory power of the six Z-score measures that are considered by using an ordinary least squares (OLS) regression model. Finally, the authors report the results of the baseline equation using the system-GMM estimator developed by Arellano and Bover (1995) and Blundell and Bond (1998) for dynamic panel data models.FindingsThe authors find that the best formula for calculating the Z-score of insurance firms is the one that combines the current value of the return on assets (ROA) and capitalization with the SD of the returns calculated over the full sample period.Research limitations/implicationsThe main limitation of the research is that it addresses only the Spanish insurance sector, and consequently, the implications of the findings must be framed in this institutional context. However, the authors think that the results could be extrapolated to other countries. Future research should consider including different countries and analyzing the usefulness of aggregated insurer-level Z-scores for macroprudential monitoring.Practical implicationsThe Z-score may be a useful early warning indicator for microprudential supervision. In addition to being an indicator of the soundness of insurers simpler than those established in the current regulation, the information provided by this accounting-based measure may help analysts and investors obtain a better understanding of insurance firms' risk factors.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to examine and compare different approaches to calculating Z-scores in the insurance sector. The few available results on the predictive power of the Z-score are mixed and focus on the banking sector.

Bank competition, risk-taking and financial stability: insights from an emerging economy

“…It allows evaluating default risk across banks with varying aims or ownership. It applies equally to all banks, whether they choose low risk/low return or high risk/high return strategies (Čihák and Hesse, 2010; Moreno et al , 2021). A bank with less capitalization might have a comparable or greater Z-score by having higher risk-adjusted returns.…”

An evaluation of the financial soundness of insurance firms in the Amman Stock Exchange

“…Moreover, the variables that ensure sound insurance system in US are the firm specific characteristics, including the exposure to natural catastrophes and macroeconomics conditions. Moreno et al (2021) showed that the Z-score of insurance firms can be calculated by ROA and capitalization with the standard deviation of returns, the Z-score index is an early warning for micro-prudential supervision. Additionally, they supported on convincing a clearer picture of insurance firms' risk factors in Spain.…”

Insurers' risk management as a business process: a prospective competitive advantage or not?

“…The financial sector also provides a mechanism to assess investment and performance decisions. Managers should develop an RM strategy consistent with the dynamic environment and the firm's risk appetite (Atluntas et al , 2011; Moreno, et al , 2021).…”

“…The financial sector also provides a mechanism to assess investment and performance decisions. Managers should develop an RM strategy consistent with the dynamic environment and the firm's risk appetite (Atluntas et al, 2011;Moreno, et al, 2021). Efficient risk integration is the bottom line of the RM process, where interrelations among risks and risk prioritization are addressed.…”