Using the ICF and psychological models of behavior to predict mobility limitations.

Dixon, Diane; Johnston, Marie; Rowley, D.I.; Pollard, Beth

doi:10.1037/0090-5550.53.2.191

Cited by 35 publications

(46 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The combined model has been found to account for more variance in activity limitations in people with pain, awaiting joint replacement surgery, than can pain severity alone (Dixon, Johnston, Rowley, & Pollard, 2008). Similar flndings were seen following surgery (Quinn et al, 2012) and also in community residents (Dixon, Johnston, Elliott, & Hannaford, 2012).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 79%

Rehabilitation following surgery: Clinical and psychological predictors of activity limitations.

Powell¹,

Johnston²,

Smith³

et al. 2013

Rehabilitation Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interventions to reduce preoperative anxiety and postoperative depression may lead to reduced 4-month activity limitations. However, the additional variance explained by psychological variables was low (ΔR² = 0.05). Our models, which included biomedical and surgical variables, accounted for less than 50% of the variance in activity limitations overall. Therefore, further investigation of psychological variables, particularly cognitions related specifically to activity behavior, would be merited.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 79%

Rehabilitation following surgery: Clinical and psychological predictors of activity limitations.

Powell¹,

Johnston²,

Smith³

et al. 2013

Rehabilitation Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…ICF is based on three major assumptions: (1) human functioning is a complex system in which biological, psychological and social dimensions dynamically interact; (2) functioning and disability result from the interaction between individual health conditions and personal and environmental factors -facilitators or barriers -which may hinder or promote participation and social inclusion; (3) the evaluation of health conditions should not only aim at identifying impairments, deficits or social restrictions, but also positive dimensions such as individuals' residual abilities, psychological assets and potentials, as well as social resources. From this perspective, both environmental and personal features can mediate the impact of disease on individuals' quality of life (Dixon, Johnston, Rowley, & Pollard, 2008;Seekins, Traci, Cummings, Oreskovich, & Reveslot, 2008). As specifically concerns caregivers, psychosocial resources can counterbalance the negative outcomes of the burden perceived in daily caring activities.…”

Section: Psychological and Social Resources In Caregivingmentioning

confidence: 99%

The relationship between burden and well-being among caregivers of Italian people diagnosed with severe neuromotor and cognitive disorders

Fianco

Sartori

Negri

et al. 2015

Research in Developmental Disabilities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The patient's decision to use an AFO can be considered a behaviour, and therefore psychological theories may also be useful in understanding AFO use and adherence, particularly the cognitive processes underlying AFO use. Therefore further studies investigating AFO use should consider use of social cognitive theories or an integrated ICF model which includes psychological theory [55,56].…”

Section: Use Of the Icfmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of the ICF to investigate impairment, activity limitation and participation restriction in people using ankle-foot orthoses to manage mobility disabilities

McMonagle

Rasmussen

Elliott

et al. 2015

Disability and Rehabilitation

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This version is available at https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/56193/ Strathprints is designed to allow users to access the research output of the University of Strathclyde. Unless otherwise explicitly stated on the manuscript, Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Please check the manuscript for details of any other licences that may have been applied. You may not engage in further distribution of the material for any profitmaking activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute both the url (https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/) and the content of this paper for research or private study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge.Any correspondence concerning this service should be sent to the Main Text IntroductionAnkle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are externally applied devices that encompass the joints of the ankle and foot. They are used to modify the structure and function of the neuromuscular and skeletal systems [1] and are used to manage mobility disabilities caused by a wide range of conditions such as stroke, cerebral palsy, spina bifida, poliomyelitis and peripheral nerve injury [2][3][4][5][6]. AFOs have been shown to improve timed walking speed, step length and clearance of the toe in the swing phase of gait. [2,3,5,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Whilst these outcome measures are valuable in providing evidence for orthotic intervention, they focus on specific aspects of physical activity that can be measured in a gait laboratory. Consequently, they do not provide any information about patients' use of AFOs in their day to day lives or the extent to which use of AFOs is associated with physical, psychological and social well-being. These outcomes are important because they are of value to the patient. Specifically, consideration of psychological well-being is vital because of its relationship with functional outcomes [15,16]. This paper adds to the literature by focusing on AFO use in a real life setting and by incorporating psychological measures to investigate differences in impairment, activity limitation and participation restriction across 3 groups of AFO users; people using AFOs as recommended, people using AFOs differently to recommended; and those not aware of recommendations for use. Use of AFOsTo identify differences in outcomes across these groups, consideration should be given to other factors that could affect AFO use. Seriousness of the underlying health condition has been related to AFO use. Dystrophy did not use their AFOs for the recommended amount of time, with all of these participants using the AFO less than recommended. This was thought to be due to pain and patient reluctance to wear the orthotic devices; however reasons for their reluctance were not formally investigated. In summary, appropriate use of orthoses is important for optimal outcomes. Identification of Health OutcomesA theoretical approach to understanding use of AFOs and their impact on pati...

show abstract

Using the ICF and psychological models of behavior to predict mobility limitations.

Cited by 35 publications

References 40 publications

Rehabilitation following surgery: Clinical and psychological predictors of activity limitations.

Rehabilitation following surgery: Clinical and psychological predictors of activity limitations.

The relationship between burden and well-being among caregivers of Italian people diagnosed with severe neuromotor and cognitive disorders

Use of the ICF to investigate impairment, activity limitation and participation restriction in people using ankle-foot orthoses to manage mobility disabilities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About