2021
DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2021.1950824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the ‘in-between’ to build quality in support relationships with people with cognitive disability: the significance of liminal spaces and time

Abstract: In a policy context of personalisation, disability support organisations recognise the increasingly contentious nature of clustering people according to disability. Instead, they are placing more emphasis on activities that promote community inclusion. Accordingly, the work between people with cognitive disability and their support workers is increasingly mobile. In this context, drawing on research using a conceptual framework based in recognition theory and social geography, this paper explores how the exper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An implication is that communication can be enhanced by employment conditions that promote continuity in person-worker interactions. In addition, training and professional development can assist workers to share their knowledge about personalised communication with other workers (Dalton & Sweeney 2013;Fisher et al 2021;Iacono et al 2019;Robinson et al 2023). Sharing experiences may improve interactions through reflection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An implication is that communication can be enhanced by employment conditions that promote continuity in person-worker interactions. In addition, training and professional development can assist workers to share their knowledge about personalised communication with other workers (Dalton & Sweeney 2013;Fisher et al 2021;Iacono et al 2019;Robinson et al 2023). Sharing experiences may improve interactions through reflection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%