2014
DOI: 10.5194/sed-6-1523-2014
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the level set method in geodynamical modeling of multi-material flows and Earth's free surface

Abstract: Abstract. The level set method allows for tracking material surfaces in 2-D and 3-D flow modeling and is well suited for applications of multi-material flow modeling. The level set method utilizes smooth level set functions to define material interfaces, which makes the method stable and free of oscillations that are typically observed in case step-like functions parameterize interfaces. By design the level set function is a signed distance function and gives for each point in the domain the exact distance to … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reduce these errors, numerical filters can be applied (Lenardic & Kaula, ) as well as flux limiters (Harten, ; Roe, ; Sweby, ) and bound‐preserving limiters (He et al, ). It is also possible to track the interface between materials through the advection of level sets (e.g., Hillebrand et al, ) or a hybrid between particle and level set methods (Samuel & Evonuk, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce these errors, numerical filters can be applied (Lenardic & Kaula, ) as well as flux limiters (Harten, ; Roe, ; Sweby, ) and bound‐preserving limiters (He et al, ). It is also possible to track the interface between materials through the advection of level sets (e.g., Hillebrand et al, ) or a hybrid between particle and level set methods (Samuel & Evonuk, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Firedrake's flexibility would make exploring different advection schemes straightforward, rendering it very well-suited to level-set approaches (e.g. Hillebrand et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a modeling view point, the influence of rigid inclusions on fluid flow has been explored at the scale of magma-chambers (Suckale et al 2012;Yamato et al 2015;Shibano et al 2013) or at that of the whole mantle (Patočka et al 2020), but seldom at the crustal scale (Deubelbeiss & Kaus 2008). In fact no previous model has explicitly incorporated deformable compositional heterogeneities in a partially molten crust, most probably because numerical codes encounter issues with mass conservation and numerical diffusion at layers interfaces (Deubelbeiss & Kaus 2008;Schmeling et al 2008;Suckale et al 2010;Hillebrand et al 2014;Pusok et al 2017;Heister et al 2017). This motivates the use of a Volume-Of-Fluid (VOF) method, dedicated to the conservation of compositional interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%