2016
DOI: 10.32523/2306-6172-2016-4-2-14-22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the Link Grammar Parser in the Study of Turkic Languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon executing the model on an attached dataset comprising 400,000 sentences, the model's performance deviated from expectations [16] and the growing challenges in text processing that arise from the increasing volume of information on the Internet [17]. The discrepancy stemmed from the fact that the original model operated on a modified algorithm for generating paraphrased sentences, courtesy of the ChatGPT-2 algorithm.…”
Section: Diversity Of Lexical Styles: Official and Informalmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Upon executing the model on an attached dataset comprising 400,000 sentences, the model's performance deviated from expectations [16] and the growing challenges in text processing that arise from the increasing volume of information on the Internet [17]. The discrepancy stemmed from the fact that the original model operated on a modified algorithm for generating paraphrased sentences, courtesy of the ChatGPT-2 algorithm.…”
Section: Diversity Of Lexical Styles: Official and Informalmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is a convenient way to test intended solutions to problems, and avoid interfering with active objects, which can lead to crashes, data loss, and system corruption. In addition, the use of simulation packages greatly facilitates the debugging and evaluation of resource management algorithms, allowing them to be carried out more quickly and efficiently [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, [12] describes the approaches focused on agglutinative languages. In most works, the authors limit themselves to considering the morphological structure of the Kazakh or Turkish languages, carry out their comparative analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%