2015
DOI: 10.1080/08832323.2015.1095703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the Major Field Test for a Bachelor's Degree in Business as a Learning Outcomes Assessment: Evidence From a Review of 20 Years of Institution-Based Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Online education platform development companies must pay attention to the impact of online education platform technology availability on the innovative behaviors of learners. Ling et al [25] should also attach importance to developing learning achievement assessment tools to improve learners' knowledge cognition, develop information search tools to facilitate learners' knowledge retrieval, develop multimedia editing tools to encourage learners' creative integration, use artificial intelligence to provide learners with personalized learning programs, and build a learner-centered learning environment by Parra and Ruiz [26]. Moreover, these companies must provide additional social ways, for example, develop rich synchronous and asynchronous communication tools to facilitate learners' social communication, emotional expression, and relationship building and develop learning communities to promote shared communication and collaborative learning among learners by Branon and Essex [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online education platform development companies must pay attention to the impact of online education platform technology availability on the innovative behaviors of learners. Ling et al [25] should also attach importance to developing learning achievement assessment tools to improve learners' knowledge cognition, develop information search tools to facilitate learners' knowledge retrieval, develop multimedia editing tools to encourage learners' creative integration, use artificial intelligence to provide learners with personalized learning programs, and build a learner-centered learning environment by Parra and Ruiz [26]. Moreover, these companies must provide additional social ways, for example, develop rich synchronous and asynchronous communication tools to facilitate learners' social communication, emotional expression, and relationship building and develop learning communities to promote shared communication and collaborative learning among learners by Branon and Essex [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It incorporates questions from nine content areas: accounting, economics, management, quantitative analysis, information systems, finance, marketing, legal and social environments, and international issues. Ling et al (2015) found evidence of a moderate correlation between MFTB scores and grade-point averages in a synthesis of 24 published studies. Other research has examined the relationship Palocsay et al: Spreadsheet Tool for Analysis of Assessment Data of MFTB performance to a variety of student characteristics, including gender, SAT scores, business major, culture, and motivation (see references in Ketcham et al 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While there are multiple approaches to assessment (Suskie 2009), both the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business International (AACSB 2013) and the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET 2018) require assessment plans that include direct evidence of student learning. Consequently, most programs employ some form of individual student testing via either a standardized instrument (Ling et al 2015; see also references in Douglas and Purzer 2015) and/or a locally designed exam (Hadjicharalambous 2014). There are a number of benefits associated with tests of course-related content that are constructed in-house, including tailoring of questions to specific learning objectives, ease of revision, and increased faculty participation in the assessment process (Smith et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…en el MFTA-B; GPA es el puntaje total del estudiante en secundaria (considerado por la literatura como logros académicos previos); SEX toma el valor de 1 si el estudiante es hombre EXCRED toma el valor de 1 si se ofrece al estudiante incentivo por buen desempeño; son efectos fijos; y eikt es el término de error. En línea con el modelo general, Ling et al (2015) concluyen que el puntaje en MFTA-B se relaciona positivamente con los logros académicos previos; Bagamery et al (2010) exponen que el puntaje obtenido favorece a los hombres, observando también una correlación positiva con el éxito de profesional; Contreras et al (2011) se cuestionan sobre las variables demográficas y el background académico, destacando la favorabilidad hacia los hombres; Messer (2021), identifica interacciones entre variables, observando una brecha de género ocasionada por la sub-representación femenina.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified