Using the NCHEC Areas of Responsibility to Assess Service Learning Outcomes in Undergraduate Health Education Students

Champagne, Nicole

doi:10.1080/19325037.2006.10598893

Cited by 14 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A number of studies analyze SL for PETE students [ 10 , 11 , 12 ]. Within the areas of physical education (PE) and physical activity (PA), Carson and Raguse [ 7 ] explain that there is a wide range of SL services for PETE students: athletic training programs [ 13 ]; recreation [ 14 , 15 ]; health education and promotion [ 16 , 17 ]; rehabilitation and therapy [ 18 , 19 ]; sports management and PE [ 20 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementing Service-Learning Programs in Physical Education; Teacher Education as Teaching and Learning Models for All the Agents Involved: A Systematic Review

Ordás

Nuviala

Grao‐Cruces

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Service-learning (SL) is the subject of a growing number of studies and is becoming increasingly popular in physical education teacher education (PETE) programs. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the implementation of SL programs with PETE students. The databases used were Web of Science, SPORTDiscus (EBSCO), and SCOPUS. Articles were selected on the basis of the following criteria: (a) published in a peer-reviewed journal; (b) covers the use of SL programs with PETE students; (c) relates to physical education or physical activity programs; (d) availability of a full-text version in English and/or Spanish. Thirty-two articles met the inclusion criteria. Two types of findings were observed: firstly, findings relating to the study characteristics and objectives and, secondly, recommendations for improvement of this type of intervention. The objectives of the different studies focused on (a) the impact of the SL methodology on PETE students’ professional, social, and personal skills; (b) its impact on the community; (c) analysis of the effectiveness and quality of the programs. All but two studies analyzed the impact of SL on PETE, while only four analyzed community participants and only three analyzed the quality of the SL program. Recommendations for improving SL programs used with PETE students included: all stakeholders, e.g., students and community participants, should be studied and coordinated; the quality of the programs should be assessed, as studying the effectiveness of SL programs could help to attain the objectives of both students and the community; mixed methods should be used; and intervention implementation periods should be extended to provide more objective, controlled measurements.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementing Service-Learning Programs in Physical Education; Teacher Education as Teaching and Learning Models for All the Agents Involved: A Systematic Review

Ordás

Nuviala

Grao‐Cruces

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Forte, 1997;Elam et al, 2003;Dorfman et al, 2003Dorfman et al, , 2004Champagne, 2006;Furze et al, 2008;Dauenhauer et al, 2010;Green et al, 2011;Kaf et al, 2011;Liang En et al, 2011a;Zucchero, 2011) used mixed methods to capture the variety of student learning outcomes described. Identifying the rationale for mixing methods, the specific techniques used or the type of analysis applied was frequently not clear.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sample sizes ranged from (n = 3) medical students in one qualitative study (Dharamsi et al, 2010b) to (n = 3450) students from multiple disciplines in a quasi experimental study (Astin & Sax, 1998). Examples of the methodological weaknesses identified included samples from single institutions (Beling, 2004;Bentley & Ellison, 2005;Champagne, 2006;Horacek et al, 2009;Leung et al, 2011;Liang En et al, 2011b;Loewenson and Hunt, 2011) with a variety of potential biases, for example, self-selection bias for students (Ngai, 2009;Green et al, 2011;Reading & Padgett, 2011) possible positive reporting bias (Kearney, 2004;Reynolds, 2005;Brown, 2009;Liang En et al, 2011b;Loewenson & Hunt, 2011) and social desirability bias (Casey and Murphy, 2008;Loewenson & Hunt, 2011). Of the 26 Quasi-experimental studies the majority (n = 20) used some form of self-report measure as did (n = 6) of the mixed method studies.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Training socially responsive health care graduates: Is service learning an effective educational approach?

McMenamin¹,

McGrath²,

Cantillon³

et al. 2014

Medical Teacher

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Survey instruments have been identified as being the most popular data collection tools in outcomes measurement and evaluation (Champagne, 2006;Newcomer & Allen, 2008). However, focusing on only one tool is problematic in terms of reaching an in-depth understanding of the phenomenon since it can lead to skewed findings (Lee & Pershing 2002).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of an Advanced Certificate in Education (ACE) Program on the Professional Practice of Graduates

Aluko

2009

IRRODL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper examines the impact of a distance education program offered by the University of Pretoria, South Africa, on the professional practice of teachers. A pilot study was conducted using a combination of surveys and focus group interviews. Findings reveal that the program was beneficial to graduates’ personal development, professional practice, schools, learners, and colleagues. Further, principals who participated in the study attested to the differences they observed between the graduates and other teachers who had not been exposed to such a program. Suggestions for improvements included the introduction of subjects taught at school as areas of specialization, involvement of school principals in the assessment of enrolled students, visits to schools by the organizers, and exposure of students to the practical opportunities offered by the program (with portfolios that could be a part of the assessment).

show abstract

Using the NCHEC Areas of Responsibility to Assess Service Learning Outcomes in Undergraduate Health Education Students

Cited by 14 publications

References 14 publications

Implementing Service-Learning Programs in Physical Education; Teacher Education as Teaching and Learning Models for All the Agents Involved: A Systematic Review

Implementing Service-Learning Programs in Physical Education; Teacher Education as Teaching and Learning Models for All the Agents Involved: A Systematic Review

Training socially responsive health care graduates: Is service learning an effective educational approach?

The Impact of an Advanced Certificate in Education (ACE) Program on the Professional Practice of Graduates

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About