2015
DOI: 10.1007/s40596-015-0430-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the Program Evaluation Committee as a Dynamic Vehicle for Improvement in Psychiatry Training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several institutions have reported on data sources and structure for the APE or similar annual reviews [9–11]. However, there is little published peer-reviewed literature regarding how training programs have designed their PECs [12, 13]. In one published report, a general surgery program’s PEC met biannually and included 1 resident, faculty members, and program leadership [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several institutions have reported on data sources and structure for the APE or similar annual reviews [9–11]. However, there is little published peer-reviewed literature regarding how training programs have designed their PECs [12, 13]. In one published report, a general surgery program’s PEC met biannually and included 1 resident, faculty members, and program leadership [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data reviewed by the PEC included surveys, resident exam performance, and clinical competency committee metrics. In another report, a psychiatry program’s PEC met every other week and examined feedback generated from monthly faculty advisor meetings, residency-wide meetings, resident evaluations, surveys, and a suggestion box, with action plans formulated by the PEC and other workgroups [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%