Abstract:BackgroundThe International Consortium (FTDC) that revised the diagnostic criteria for behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) did not have an Asian representation. Whether the revised criteria are equally useful in the early detection of Asian bvFTD patients therefore remains largely unexplored. Earlier studies have indicated differences in clinical manifestations in Indian and other Asian bvFTD patients when compared to western groups. There is an urgent need for clarification, given the projecte… Show more
“…without data on their C9ORF72 status), while the number of diagnostic criteria seems to be lower in patients with the C9ORF72 expansion. This argument is supported by the finding that in neuropathological and clinical cohorts, the sensitivity of each possible feature is on average very high (over 50%) except for hyperorality [ 7 , 9 , 10 , 17 , 18 ] while Devenney and colleagues found the mean number of possible bvFTD features to be 4.2/6 in patients with the C9ORF72 expansion which is slightly higher compared to our results (3.19/6 features). Executive dysfunction in the neuropsychological profile was detected in all of the patients and this was found even in the early stages of the disease or in cases that did not fulfill the criteria for bvFTD.…”
BackgroundThe C9ORF72 expansion is one of the most common genetic etiologies observed with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). Revised diagnostic criteria for bvFTD (FTDC) were recently introduced but only a few studies have evaluated the accuracy of these criteria.ObjectiveThe objective of the study was to evaluate the applicability of the FTDC criteria and assess the psychiatric history of these patients.MethodsThe study examined 36 patients carrying the C9ORF72 expansion and suffering from bvFTD (N = 32) or from bvFTD with motor neuron disease (bvFTD-MND, N = 4). Neuropsychological, neuropsychiatric, structural brain imaging and PET/SPECT data were evaluated.ResultsWe found 0.75 sensitivity (SD 0.44, 95%CI 0.57–0.87) for possible bvFTD and 0.64 (SD 0.44, 95%CI 0.57–0.87) for probable bvFTD. The sensitivity was even higher in bvFTD patients without MND, i.e., 0.81 for possible bvFTD and 0.69 for probable bvFTD. PET/SPECT was normal in 17.6% of scanned patients with bvFTD. A history of psychiatric symptoms (psychotic and/or mood symptoms) was detected in 61% of cases.ConclusionsThe FTDC possible and probable bvFTD criteria seem to identify the majority of the C9ORF72 expansion carriers with bvFTD, even though they exhibit only a limited number of behavioral criteria but a significant amount of psychiatric symptoms. The presence of a normal PET/SPECT does not exclude the possibility the C9ORF72 associated bvFTD.
“…without data on their C9ORF72 status), while the number of diagnostic criteria seems to be lower in patients with the C9ORF72 expansion. This argument is supported by the finding that in neuropathological and clinical cohorts, the sensitivity of each possible feature is on average very high (over 50%) except for hyperorality [ 7 , 9 , 10 , 17 , 18 ] while Devenney and colleagues found the mean number of possible bvFTD features to be 4.2/6 in patients with the C9ORF72 expansion which is slightly higher compared to our results (3.19/6 features). Executive dysfunction in the neuropsychological profile was detected in all of the patients and this was found even in the early stages of the disease or in cases that did not fulfill the criteria for bvFTD.…”
BackgroundThe C9ORF72 expansion is one of the most common genetic etiologies observed with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). Revised diagnostic criteria for bvFTD (FTDC) were recently introduced but only a few studies have evaluated the accuracy of these criteria.ObjectiveThe objective of the study was to evaluate the applicability of the FTDC criteria and assess the psychiatric history of these patients.MethodsThe study examined 36 patients carrying the C9ORF72 expansion and suffering from bvFTD (N = 32) or from bvFTD with motor neuron disease (bvFTD-MND, N = 4). Neuropsychological, neuropsychiatric, structural brain imaging and PET/SPECT data were evaluated.ResultsWe found 0.75 sensitivity (SD 0.44, 95%CI 0.57–0.87) for possible bvFTD and 0.64 (SD 0.44, 95%CI 0.57–0.87) for probable bvFTD. The sensitivity was even higher in bvFTD patients without MND, i.e., 0.81 for possible bvFTD and 0.69 for probable bvFTD. PET/SPECT was normal in 17.6% of scanned patients with bvFTD. A history of psychiatric symptoms (psychotic and/or mood symptoms) was detected in 61% of cases.ConclusionsThe FTDC possible and probable bvFTD criteria seem to identify the majority of the C9ORF72 expansion carriers with bvFTD, even though they exhibit only a limited number of behavioral criteria but a significant amount of psychiatric symptoms. The presence of a normal PET/SPECT does not exclude the possibility the C9ORF72 associated bvFTD.
“…Eleven studies were North American [3,7,19,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38], eleven were Western European [8,10,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47] and four were from Southeast and East Asia [5,48,49,50]. One was multi-continental [4].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, complex FTD phenotypes that cross syndrome boundaries are not uncommon [34]. It is worth noting that we directly adopted the diagnoses specified by the studies, which were sometimes those made at presentation [4,8,41,50,56,61], sometimes the most recent [10,32,33,36,46], and often had unspecified timing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since our data derive largely from Caucasian subjects living in the United States and Western Europe, the generalizability of our findings to other regions might be at issue. The cross-cultural problem was raised in a report from India [50] that described florid presentations and called for modified criteria to accommodate cultural modes and facilitate earlier case identification, but there is also a report from Nigeria about a case presenting 2 years into the illness with features that matched contemporary diagnostic criteria [69]. …”
Background: Survival in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is not well understood. We conducted a mixed effects meta-analysis of survival in FTD to examine phenotype differences and contributory factors. Methods: The PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane databases were searched for studies describing survival or natural history of behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), progressive non-fluent aphasia (PNFA), semantic dementia (SD), FTD with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (FTD-ALS), progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal degeneration. There were no language restrictions. Results: We included 27 studies (2,462 subjects). Aggregate mean and median survival were derived for each phenotype and, for comparison, Alzheimer's disease (AD) (using data from the selected studies). Survival was shortest in FTD-ALS (2.5 years). Mean survival was longest in bvFTD and PNFA (8 years) and median survival in SD (12 years). AD was comparable in survival to all except FTD-ALS. Age and sex did not affect survival; the education effect was equivocal. Heterogeneity in FTD survival was largely, but not wholly, explained by phenotypes. Conclusions: Survival differs for FTD phenotypes but, except for FTD-ALS, compares well to AD survival. Elucidating the potential causes of within-phenotype heterogeneity in survival (such as complicating features and comorbidities) may open up opportunities for tailored interventions.
“…Relevant data from Asia are sparse (Ikeda et al, Table 3. Family history data in each diagnostic group 2004; Ghosh et al, 2013). Our study is one of the largest reports of FTLD in an Asian population.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.