2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeps.2013.01.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the Schmidt Hammer on Rock Mass Characteristic in Sedimentary Rock at Tutupan Coal Mine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The statistical results of R L for the materials tested also show that the mean R L values follow the same descending order as observed for the median values. Finally, it is also indicated that the values obtained in this study are well within the range of values reported in other studies for quartz and quartzite [54], marble [55] and metasandstone [56]. …”
Section: Schmidt Rebound Valuessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The statistical results of R L for the materials tested also show that the mean R L values follow the same descending order as observed for the median values. Finally, it is also indicated that the values obtained in this study are well within the range of values reported in other studies for quartz and quartzite [54], marble [55] and metasandstone [56]. …”
Section: Schmidt Rebound Valuessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Such ambiguous surfaces were avoided in the present context. The measurements were made under dry conditions, away from any water seepages or drainage systems (Matthews et al, 2016;Saptono et al, 2013). These measurement points represent unweathered outcrops from various localities, over an area of 457 km 2 (Fig.…”
Section: R-value Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in natural setting which, on the contrary influence the vulnerability (Obert and Duvall, 1967;Sardana et al, 2019). To evaluate UCS, both in-situ and laboratory tests were performed to obtain and establish the strength values and their correlation between in-field and laboratory data (Saptono et al, 2013;Matthews et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the application of the technique, certain precautions, however, need to be taken; for example, tested stone should be apparently elastic and should not disintegrate under the impact of the hammer and measurements should be carried out on smooth surfaces [ 22 ]. Paying attention to these issues, researchers have reported satisfactory correlations between Schmidt hammer rebound number and physical properties of stones [ 23 ]. In this study, a device with impact energy of 2.207 Nm was used.…”
Section: Determination Of the Mechanical Properties Of Tomb Materimentioning
confidence: 99%