2018
DOI: 10.3389/fict.2018.00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the TAM and Functional Analysis to Predict the Most Used Functions of an Active Learning Classroom (ALC)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TAM and its various versions represent the model's credibility in facilitating the assessment of various learning technologies (Granić & Marangunić, 2019). Other research states that the credibility of the TAM model lies in facilitating various technology application criteria (Poellhuber et al, 2018). Meanwhile, other research states that electronic learning systems have a positive and significant effect on ESQ through student satisfaction.…”
Section: Structural Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TAM and its various versions represent the model's credibility in facilitating the assessment of various learning technologies (Granić & Marangunić, 2019). Other research states that the credibility of the TAM model lies in facilitating various technology application criteria (Poellhuber et al, 2018). Meanwhile, other research states that electronic learning systems have a positive and significant effect on ESQ through student satisfaction.…”
Section: Structural Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing research on active learning spaces has evaluated academic performance (Brooks, 2011;Brooks & Solheim, 2014;Dori & Belcher, 2005;, instructor and student behavior (Brooks, 2012), most used utility functions (Poellhuber, Fournier St-Laurent, & Roy, 2018), and perceptions of the space regarding different aspects of learning, teaching, and technology (Benoit, 2017;Chiu, 2016;Chiu & Cheng, 2017;Connolly & Lampe, 2016;Gordy, Jones, & Bailey, 2018;Gordy, Zhang, Sullivan, Bailey, & Carr, 2019;Lee, Morrone, & Siering, 2018;Park & Choi, 2014). Results from these studies showed that active learning spaces promote student engagement and peer interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%