2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40617-018-00302-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the Teacher IRAP (T-IRAP) interactive computerized programme to teach complex flexible relational responding with children with diagnosed autism spectrum disorder

Abstract: The research used an alternating-treatments design to compare relational responding for five children with diagnosed autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in two teaching conditions. Both conditions used applied behavior analysis; one was usual tabletop teaching (TT), and one was an interactive computerized teaching program, the Teacher-Implicit Relational Assessment Programme (T-IRAP; Kilroe, Murphy, Barnes-Holmes, & Barnes-Holmes, Behavioral Development Bulletin, 19(2), 60-80, 2014). Relational skills targeted were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future research should not only include basic computer programs but also extend this basic research study to actual in-person changes. Perceptions alone may differ from what people may actually do (e.g., one may experience stigmatizing thoughts but may not act on them; Murphy et al, 2019). These measures are also behavioral measures attained via self-report, which may present some potential issues regarding reliability (Newsome et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research should not only include basic computer programs but also extend this basic research study to actual in-person changes. Perceptions alone may differ from what people may actually do (e.g., one may experience stigmatizing thoughts but may not act on them; Murphy et al, 2019). These measures are also behavioral measures attained via self-report, which may present some potential issues regarding reliability (Newsome et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participants in the original studies provided informed consent and studies were approved by the local institutional review board. This dataset includes on data from the traditional IRAP and not variants such as MT-IRAP (Levin et al, 2010), NL-IRAP (Kavanagh et al, 2016), or training-IRAP (Murphy et al, 2019). If the original study required participants to complete the same IRAP more than once, only data from the first one completed was used.…”
Section: Ian Husseymentioning
confidence: 99%