Using Transaction Prices to Re-Examine Price Dispersion in Electronic Markets

Abstract

Price dispersion is an important indicator of market efficiency. Internet-based electronic markets have the potential to reduce transaction and search costs, thereby creating more efficient, "frictionless" markets, as predicted by theories in information economics. However, earlier work has reported significant levels of price dispersion on the Internet, which is in contrast to theoretical predictions. A key feature of the existing stream of work has been its use of posted prices to estimate price dispersion. In theory, this can lead to an overestimation of price dispersion because a sale may not have occurred at the posted price. In this research, we use a unique data set of actual transaction prices collected from both the electronic and offline markets of buyers in a business-to-business market to evaluate the extent of price dispersion. We find that price dispersion in the electronic market is as low as 0.22%, which is substantially less than that reported in the existing literature. This near-zero price dispersion suggests that in some electronic markets the "law of one price" can prevail when we consider transaction prices, instead of posted prices. We further develop a theoretical framework that identifies several new drivers of price dispersion using transaction data. In particular, we focus on four product-level and market-level attributes-product cost, order cycle time, own price elasticity, and transaction quantity, and we estimate their impact on price dispersion. We also examine the electronic market's moderating role in the relationship between these drivers and price dispersion. Finally, we estimate the efficiency gains that accrue from transactions in the relatively friction-free market and find that the electronic market can enhance consumer surplus by as much as $97.92 million per year. Using Transaction Prices to Re-Examine Price Dispersion in Electronic Markets ABSTRACTPrice dispersion is an important indicator of market efficiency. Internet-based electronic markets have the potential to reduce transaction and search costs, thereby creating more efficient, "frictionless," markets as predicted by theories in information economics. However, prior work has reported significant levels of price dispersion on the Internet, which is in contrast to theoretical predictions. A key feature of the existing stream of work has been its use of posted prices to estimate price dispersion. In theory, this can lead to an overestimation of price dispersion because a sale may not have occurred at the posted price. In this research, we use a unique dataset of actual transaction prices collected from both the electronic and offline markets of buyers in a B2B market to evaluate the extent of price dispersion. We find that price dispersion in the electronic market is as low as 0.22%, which is substantially less than those reported in the existing literature. This near-zero price dispersion suggests that in some electronic markets the "law of one price" can prevail when we consider transaction prices instead ...

Price Setting in Online Markets: Does IT Click?

“…As the share of identified weekly sales is small (within the 1.3%-1.7% range; see Table 3) and half of the products in the dataset do not have sales at all, the dispersion of regular prices is 26. Dispersion of online prices has been studied for specific markets such as books (e.g., Chevalier and Goolsbee 2003), CDs (e.g., Brynjolfsson and Smith 2000), consumer electronics (e.g., Baye et al 2004), prepaid phone cards (e.g., Ong and Zhong 2011), travel (e.g., Clemons et al 2002), or business-to-business supplies (e.g., Ghose and Yao 2011). While analyses of these markets are informative, these markets are unusual in many respects (e.g., Einav et al 2015 study bidding and price behavior in eBay auctions), and hence generalization is not straightforward.…”

A Study of Price Evolution in Online Toy Market

“…Based on these literatures and for simplicity, our study uses posted price as well as full prices (i.e., posted price plus shipping cost, similar to price paid at "check out", as though a transaction has taken place) for measuring price dispersion. There have been interesting studies conducted recently based on the use of actual transaction prices to estimate price dispersion (Ghose and Yao, 2011;Sengupta, 2007), such prices can certainly be considered in the extension of our study. Our present study extends beyond the existing literatures by examining the dynamics of pricing across three years' time span.…”

Price dispersion and online markets maturity in Poland

“…Methodological approaches in studies for price dispersion vary, however the coefficient of variation has been used by Ghose and Yao (2011), Sengupta and Wiggins (2012), Duch-Brown and Martins (2014), Szopiński and Nowacki (2014), therefore, probably, it is the best known estimation method. In this analysis of price dispersion, relative standard deviation is considered a primary method of measurement.…”