2021
DOI: 10.14569/ijacsa.2021.0121087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Transfer Learning for Nutrient Deficiency Prediction and Classification in Tomato Plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, Inception-V3 consistently delivered superior performance across all datasets. This can be attributed to its deeper architecture, which enable more robust feature extraction capabilities, as observed in previous studies comparing CNN architectures [8,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, Inception-V3 consistently delivered superior performance across all datasets. This can be attributed to its deeper architecture, which enable more robust feature extraction capabilities, as observed in previous studies comparing CNN architectures [8,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…However, the lack of such nutrients harms the plant, leading to yield loss for farmers [7]. According to [8], the conventional methods that rely on visual inspection by agriculture specialists for plant nutrient deficiency identification are time-consuming and labour-intensive. The agriculture industry has increasingly adopted machine learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of plant health diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, the main idea is the transfer of knowledge, called transfer learning [ 28 ]. DenseNet [ 14 , 17 , 29 ], AlexNet [ 14 ], VGG [ 14 , 17 , 19 ], ResNet [ 14 , 19 , 24 ], Inception-ResNet [ 15 , 17 , 30 ], Inception [ 19 , 30 ], EfficientNet [ 29 , 30 ] and MobileNet [ 29 , 30 ] are some of the learning transfer models that are commonly used in the literature and have been found by researchers to be successful in experiments related to plant health. Many different parameters, such as the depth and width of the models, the convolution layers used, the connections between the layers, etc., differentiate the architectures of the models and affect the performance of the models in factors such as success and training time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers that used pre-trained neural networks, i.e., models called Transfer Learning (DenseNet, NasNet, InceptionResnet, VGG, and GoogleNet), were able to make predictions that demonstrated an accuracy above 86%. Kusanur [ 19 ] detected magnesium and calcium deficiency in tomato plants, while Rahadiyan [ 20 ] detected potassium, calcium, magnesium and sulfur deficiency in chili pepper. Due to the variety and lack of data in the studies, processes such as resizing, shearing, rotation, scaling, mirroring and cropping in images were observed to improve the results, while processes such as changing the color scale or adding noise reduced the accuracy [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNN models were also frequently used in applications for nutrient detection. This was demonstrated in soybean leaf defoliation in [ 70 ], nutrient concentration in [ 72 ], nutrient deficiencies in [ 75 ], net photosynthesis modeling in [ 71 ] and calcium and magnesium deficiencies in [ 73 ]. As shown in [ 74 ], the cadmium concentration of lettuce leaves was estimated using a different DL model called DBN that was optimized using particle swarm optimization.…”
Section: Deep Learning In Ceamentioning
confidence: 99%